rond.mykleb...@netapp.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; de...@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFSD: fix races in service per-net resources allocation
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:52:32PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
12.02.2013 00:58, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
void svc_close_net(struct s
g
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFSD: fix races in service per-net resources allocation
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:52:32PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 12.02.2013 00:58, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
>
> > void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
> > {
> >-
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:52:32PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 12.02.2013 00:58, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
>
> > void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
> > {
> >-svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
> >-svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
12.02.2013 00:58, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
{
- svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
- svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
-
- svc_clear_pools(serv, net);
- /*
-* At this point the
11.02.2013 20:37, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:18:18AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
This one looks a bit complicated and confusing to me. Probably because
I'm not that familiar with service transports processing logic. So,
as I can see, we now try to run over all per-
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:37:15AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:18:18AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> > This one looks a bit complicated and confusing to me. Probably because
> > I'm not that familiar with service transports processing logic. So,
> > as I can s
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:18:18AM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> This one looks a bit complicated and confusing to me. Probably because
> I'm not that familiar with service transports processing logic. So,
> as I can see, we now try to run over all per-net pool-assigned
> transports, remove
11.02.2013 04:25, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:28:21PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
After "NFS" (SUNRPC + NFSd actually) containerization work some basic
principles of SUNRPC service initialization and deinitialization has been
changed: now one service can be shared be
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:28:21PM +0300, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> After "NFS" (SUNRPC + NFSd actually) containerization work some basic
> principles of SUNRPC service initialization and deinitialization has been
> changed: now one service can be shared between different network namespaces
> a
After "NFS" (SUNRPC + NFSd actually) containerization work some basic
principles of SUNRPC service initialization and deinitialization has been
changed: now one service can be shared between different network namespaces
and network "resources" can be attached or detached from the running service.
T
10 matches
Mail list logo