The "+" thing seems a little odd.  Why not use "||" instead?  The sum of the 
two returns isn't really the important thing, is it?  It is that either call to 
svc_close_list() returns non-zero.

        Thanx...

                ps


-----Original Message-----
From: linux-nfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org] 
On Behalf Of J. Bruce Fields
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 3:46 PM
To: Stanislav Kinsbursky
Cc: a...@linux-foundation.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; 
trond.mykleb...@netapp.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; de...@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NFSD: fix races in service per-net resources allocation

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:52:32PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 12.02.2013 00:58, J. Bruce Fields пишет:
> <snip>
> >  void svc_close_net(struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net)
> >  {
> >-    svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
> >-    svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
> >-
> >-    svc_clear_pools(serv, net);
> >-    /*
> >-     * At this point the sp_sockets lists will stay empty, since
> >-     * svc_xprt_enqueue will not add new entries without taking the
> >-     * sp_lock and checking XPT_BUSY.
> >-     */
> >-    svc_clear_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
> >-    svc_clear_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
> >+    int closed;
> >+    int delay = 0;
> >+
> >+again:
> >+    closed = svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net);
> >+    closed += svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net);
> >+    if (closed) {
> >+            svc_clean_up_xprts(serv, net);
> >+            msleep(delay++);
> >+            goto again;
> >+    }
> 
> Frankly, this hunk above makes me feel sick... :( But I have no better 
> idea right now...
> Maybe make this hunk a bit less weird (this is from my POW only, of course), 
> like this:
> 
> > +   while (svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_permsocks, net) +
> > +          svc_close_list(serv, &serv->sv_tempsocks, net)) {
> > +           svc_clean_up_xprts(serv, net);
> > +           msleep(delay++);
> > +   }
> 
> ?

OK, that's a little more compact at least.

--b.

> 
> Anyway, thanks!
> 
> Acked-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbur...@parallels.com>
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the 
body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to