Re: [PATCH] vm: mlock superfluous variable

Chris Wright wrote: * Darren Hart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The were a couple long standing (since at least 2.4.21) superfluous variables and two unnecessary assignments in do_mlock(). The intent of the resulting code is also more obvious. Tested on a 4 way x86 box running a simple mlock test

Re: [PATCH] vm: mlock superfluous variable

* Darren Hart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The were a couple long standing (since at least 2.4.21) superfluous > variables and two unnecessary assignments in do_mlock(). The intent of > the resulting code is also more obvious. > > Tested on a 4 way x86 box running a simple mlock test program.

[PATCH] vm: mlock superfluous variable

The were a couple long standing (since at least 2.4.21) superfluous variables and two unnecessary assignments in do_mlock(). The intent of the resulting code is also more obvious. Tested on a 4 way x86 box running a simple mlock test program. No problems detected. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart