* Darren Hart ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The were a couple long standing (since at least 2.4.21) superfluous > variables and two unnecessary assignments in do_mlock(). The intent of > the resulting code is also more obvious. > > Tested on a 4 way x86 box running a simple mlock test program. No > problems detected.
Did you test with multiple page ranges, and locking subsets of vmas? Seems that splitting could cause a problem since you now sample vm_end before and after fixup, where the vma could be changed in the middle. thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
