On 08. 12. 20, 12:13, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:20:39AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
Delete this dead code; but leave the definition of struct termiox in the
UAPI headers intact.
I am thinking -- can/should we mark the structure as deprecated so that
userspace stops using
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:20:39AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > > Delete this dead code; but leave the definition of struct termiox in the
> > > > UAPI headers intact.
> > >
> > > I am thinking -- can/should we mark the structure as deprecated so that
> > > userspace stops using it eventually?
>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 11:19:04AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:10:16AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:51:07AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > > > > > On 03. 12. 20, 3
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:10:16AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:51:07AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > > > > On 03. 12. 20, 3:03, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > > > > > Delete this dead code; but leave th
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:51:07AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04. 12. 20, 9:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:20:39AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 04. 12. 20, 9:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > >
On 04. 12. 20, 9:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:20:39AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 04. 12. 20, 9:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 03. 12. 20, 3:03, Jann Horn wrote:
set_termiox() and the TCGETX handler bail
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:20:39AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 04. 12. 20, 9:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > > On 03. 12. 20, 3:03, Jann Horn wrote:
> > > > set_termiox() and the TCGETX handler bail out with -EINVAL immediately
> >
On 04. 12. 20, 9:17, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
On 03. 12. 20, 3:03, Jann Horn wrote:
set_termiox() and the TCGETX handler bail out with -EINVAL immediately
if ->termiox is NULL, but there are no code paths that can set
->termiox to a n
On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03. 12. 20, 3:03, Jann Horn wrote:
> > set_termiox() and the TCGETX handler bail out with -EINVAL immediately
> > if ->termiox is NULL, but there are no code paths that can set
> > ->termiox to a non-NULL pointer; and no such code pat
On 03. 12. 20, 3:03, Jann Horn wrote:
set_termiox() and the TCGETX handler bail out with -EINVAL immediately
if ->termiox is NULL, but there are no code paths that can set
->termiox to a non-NULL pointer; and no such code paths seem to have
existed since the termiox mechanism was introduced back
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 03:03:31AM +0100, Jann Horn wrote:
> set_termiox() and the TCGETX handler bail out with -EINVAL immediately
> if ->termiox is NULL, but there are no code paths that can set
> ->termiox to a non-NULL pointer; and no such code paths seem to have
> existed since the termiox mec
set_termiox() and the TCGETX handler bail out with -EINVAL immediately
if ->termiox is NULL, but there are no code paths that can set
->termiox to a non-NULL pointer; and no such code paths seem to have
existed since the termiox mechanism was introduced back in
commit 1d65b4a088de ("tty: Add termio
12 matches
Mail list logo