On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 08:22:41AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03. 12. 20, 3:03, Jann Horn wrote:
> > set_termiox() and the TCGETX handler bail out with -EINVAL immediately
> > if ->termiox is NULL, but there are no code paths that can set
> > ->termiox to a non-NULL pointer; and no such code paths seem to have
> > existed since the termiox mechanism was introduced back in
> > commit 1d65b4a088de ("tty: Add termiox") in v2.6.28.
> > Similarly, no driver actually implements .set_termiox; and it looks like
> > no driver ever has.
>
> Nice!
>
> > Delete this dead code; but leave the definition of struct termiox in the
> > UAPI headers intact.
>
> I am thinking -- can/should we mark the structure as deprecated so that
> userspace stops using it eventually?
If it doesn't do anything, how can userspace even use it today? :)
