Re: [PATCH] safty check of MAX_RT_PRIO >= MAX_USER_RT_PRIO

2005-07-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We > > should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to > > not make it a .config option just now, becau

Re: [PATCH] safty check of MAX_RT_PRIO >= MAX_USER_RT_PRIO

2005-07-27 Thread Steven Rostedt
The subject should be "[PATCH] safety check of MAX_RT_PRIO >= MAX_USER_RT_PRIO". Ever since I've upgraded my debian unstable, I've lost my spell checking! -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majord

[PATCH] safty check of MAX_RT_PRIO >= MAX_USER_RT_PRIO

2005-07-27 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We > should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to > not make it a .config option just now, because that tends to be fiddled > with. So Ingo, would y