On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i'm not excluding that this will become necessary in the future. We > should also add the safety check to sched.h - all i'm suggesting is to > not make it a .config option just now, because that tends to be fiddled > with.
So Ingo, would you agree that at least this patch should go in? -- Steve (Patched against 2.6.12.2) Index: vanilla_kernel/include/linux/sched.h =================================================================== --- vanilla_kernel/include/linux/sched.h (revision 263) +++ vanilla_kernel/include/linux/sched.h (working copy) @@ -392,6 +392,10 @@ #define MAX_USER_RT_PRIO 100 #define MAX_RT_PRIO MAX_USER_RT_PRIO +#if MAX_USER_RT_PRIO > MAX_RT_PRIO +#error MAX_USER_RT_PRIO must not be greater than MAX_RT_PRIO +#endif + #define MAX_PRIO (MAX_RT_PRIO + 40) #define rt_task(p) (unlikely((p)->prio < MAX_RT_PRIO)) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
