On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:28:27PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 09/23/2013 12:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >>If the "regulator-name" property is not present use the name of the
> >>devicetree
> >>node as a fallback.
> >
On 09/23/2013 12:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
If the "regulator-name" property is not present use the name of the devicetree
node as a fallback.
You're not supposed to use the node name for anything, the goal is that
it's entirely
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> If the "regulator-name" property is not present use the name of the devicetree
> node as a fallback.
You're not supposed to use the node name for anything, the goal is that
it's entirely ornamental noise. Which is a bit annoyin
If the "regulator-name" property is not present use the name of the devicetree
node as a fallback.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen
---
drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c |2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c
i
4 matches
Mail list logo