On 09/23/2013 12:15 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:47:34PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
If the "regulator-name" property is not present use the name of the devicetree
node as a fallback.
You're not supposed to use the node name for anything, the goal is that
it's entirely ornamental noise. Which is a bit annoying but there we
are.
Is this documented somewhere? I'd be interested in the rationale behind this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
