On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 08:19:25AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >Jeremy, could you please test Dave's patches and make sure that they
> >work for you? That way I can apply your Tested-by. Dave, any objection
> >to my adding Jeremy's Reported-by
On Wed, 08 Nov 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Jeremy, could you please test Dave's patches and make sure that they
work for you? That way I can apply your Tested-by. Dave, any objection
to my adding Jeremy's Reported-by to your /201 patch?
No, feel free.
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Hi,
On 11/08/2017 11:44 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:57:07AM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
On 11/08/2017 10:48 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:45:23AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 20
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:57:07AM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 10:48 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:45:23AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >>On Tue, 07 Nov 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:07:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wr
On 11/08/2017 10:48 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:45:23AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:07:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:01:58PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
Hi,
On
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:45:23AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Nov 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:07:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:01:58PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On 10/10/2017 10:52 AM, Jere
On Tue, 07 Nov 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:07:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:01:58PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/10/2017 10:52 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> >If nwriters_stress=0 is passed to the lock torture test
> >it wil
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:27:50AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:15:55PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > But Jeremy's list of email addresses is what you would expect from
> > looking at MAINTAINERS, so how about the following patch?
>
> True; I tend to also look at
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:15:55PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> But Jeremy's list of email addresses is what you would expect from
> looking at MAINTAINERS, so how about the following patch?
True; I tend to also look at git history (as goes get_maintainers.pl
IIRC).
> commit 58322063498c8f5a3
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:07:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:01:58PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 10/10/2017 10:52 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> > >If nwriters_stress=0 is passed to the lock torture test
> > >it will panic in:
> >
> > Ping?
> >
> >
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:01:58PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/10/2017 10:52 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> >If nwriters_stress=0 is passed to the lock torture test
> >it will panic in:
>
> Ping?
>
> Has anyone had a chance to look at this?
Helps if you Cc the people actually workin
Hi,
On 10/10/2017 10:52 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
If nwriters_stress=0 is passed to the lock torture test
it will panic in:
Ping?
Has anyone had a chance to look at this?
Thanks,
Internal error: Oops: 9605 [#1] SMP
...
[] __torture_print_stats+0x2c/0x1c8 [locktorture]
[] lock_torture_s
If nwriters_stress=0 is passed to the lock torture test
it will panic in:
Internal error: Oops: 9605 [#1] SMP
...
[] __torture_print_stats+0x2c/0x1c8 [locktorture]
[] lock_torture_stats_print+0x74/0x120 [locktorture]
[] lock_torture_stats+0x40/0xa8 [locktorture]
[] kthread+0x108/0x138
[] ret_f
13 matches
Mail list logo
