On Tue, 07 Nov 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 10:07:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 02:01:58PM -0600, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/10/2017 10:52 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> >If nwriters_stress=0 is passed to the lock torture test
> >it will panic in:
>
> Ping?
>
> Has anyone had a chance to look at this?

Helps if you Cc the people actually working on this stuff of course...

Thank you for the forward, Peter, I have queued Jeremy's patch for
testing and review.

fyi I had proposed the following a while back, which I think is more
complete than this patch:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/15/201

Ah, there's also this (unrelated) fix:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/15/203


But Jeremy's list of email addresses is what you would expect from
looking at MAINTAINERS, so how about the following patch?

                                                        Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

commit 58322063498c8f5a3cc88f95bee237a0ce81f70a
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue Nov 7 14:10:03 2017 -0800

   torture: Place all torture-test modules in one MAINTAINERS group

   There is some confusion about where patches to kernel/torture.c
   and kernel/locking/locktorture.c should be sent.  This commit
   therefore updates MAINTAINERS appropriately.

   Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
   Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 2d3d750b19c0..eab868adedc6 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -8091,6 +8091,7 @@ F:        arch/*/include/asm/rwsem.h
F:      include/linux/seqlock.h
F:      lib/locking*.[ch]
F:      kernel/locking/
+X:     kernel/locking/locktorture.c

LOGICAL DISK MANAGER SUPPORT (LDM, Windows 2000/XP/Vista Dynamic Disks)
M:      "Richard Russon (FlatCap)" <l...@flatcap.org>
@@ -11318,15 +11319,6 @@ L:     linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org
S:      Orphan
F:      drivers/net/wireless/ray*

-RCUTORTURE MODULE
-M:     Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>
-M:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-L:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
-S:     Supported
-T:     git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
-F:     Documentation/RCU/torture.txt
-F:     kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
-
RCUTORTURE TEST FRAMEWORK
M:      "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
M:      Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>
@@ -13558,6 +13550,18 @@ L:     platform-driver-...@vger.kernel.org
S:      Maintained
F:      drivers/platform/x86/topstar-laptop.c

+TORTURE-TEST MODULES
+M:     Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net>
+M:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+M:     Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>
+L:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+S:     Supported
+T:     git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
+F:     Documentation/RCU/torture.txt
+F:     kernel/torture.c
+F:     kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+F:     kernel/locking/locktorture.c

Sure, if you think this is the best way to go, I have no problem.

Thanks,
Davidlohr

Reply via email to