On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:19:22PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Thanks, uh, I probably saw that message too.
>
> Hm, trying it just now--it catches the svclock.c mistake, but not the
> one in nfsd/nfs4xdr.c--at least not as far as I can tell.
fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c:2659:32: warning: incorrect typ
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:11:41AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday July 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:33:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Oops, thanks; these are my fault.
> >
> > (How are you finding these? I was assuming sparse, but running a make
On Thursday July 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:33:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> >
>
> Oops, thanks; these are my fault.
>
> (How are you finding these? I was assuming sparse, but running a make
> -C2 just now I didn't see anything that would have suggested these
> fix
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:33:49PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
Oops, thanks; these are my fault.
(How are you finding these? I was assuming sparse, but running a make
-C2 just now I didn't see anything that would have suggested these
fixes. I'm using whatever's current in Fedora--it says 0.3-1.fc7
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/lockd/svclock.c |6 +++---
fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index b3efa45..a21e4bc 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@
5 matches
Mail list logo
