On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:01 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'.
>> The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more
>> generic (like ethernet or pci)
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> So I think I'd ask you to recommend a name, should we just us 'hwspinlock'.
> The general view from ePAPR and dts is the node name should be a bit more
> generic (like ethernet or pci). So what would you suggest?
How about 'hwlock' ?
This
On Aug 10, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> + Grant
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
>> b/Documen
On Aug 12, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/10/13 12:11, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>> Otherwise, Stephen - do we have your Ack here? I was happy to see your
>> review but not sure what's the latest status.
>
> The smp_mb() should be removed. Otherwise I'm willing to accept that we
> on
On 08/10/13 12:11, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> Otherwise, Stephen - do we have your Ack here? I was happy to see your
> review but not sure what's the latest status.
The smp_mb() should be removed. Otherwise I'm willing to accept that we
only build this driver on ARCH_MSM for now. We can fix that in t
+ Grant
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
> new fil
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
new file mode 100
On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>> +#include
> >>> +#include
> >>> +
> >>> +#include
> >
> > please.
>
> will change, I choice since *_relaxed are arm specific.
>
I thought readl_relaxed() was universal
On Jul 29, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000..ddd6889
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/
On 07/29, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..ddd6889
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.
On Jul 29, 2013, at 3:11 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM
> SoC (MSM8974, etc).
>
> CC: Jeffrey Hugo
> CC: Eric Holmberg
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
> ---
[ had old device tree mailing list ]
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/
Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on newer MSM
SoC (MSM8974, etc).
CC: Jeffrey Hugo
CC: Eric Holmberg
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/tcsr-mutex.txt | 20 +++
drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig | 11 ++
drivers/hwsp
12 matches
Mail list logo
