[PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in -- Again

2000-10-23 Thread Tom Rini
This is the suggestion that Petr made and was approved by the maintainer. Can we get this in 2.4.0-test10-pre6 please? Without this patch, if you have CONFIG_INET turned off, you have to go through the CONFIG_NLS stuffs. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ --- fs/nls/Config.

Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in

2000-10-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:20:25PM +0200, Urban Widmark wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Tom Rini wrote: > > > Hello all. The attached patch changes the behavoir of fs/nls/Config.in from: > > CONFIG_SMB_FS != n to CONFIG_INET = y && CONFIG_SMB_FS != n. This is neeed > > because if CONFIG_INET isn'

Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in

2000-10-19 Thread Urban Widmark
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Tom Rini wrote: > Hello all. The attached patch changes the behavoir of fs/nls/Config.in from: > CONFIG_SMB_FS != n to CONFIG_INET = y && CONFIG_SMB_FS != n. This is neeed > because if CONFIG_INET isn't set, CONFIG_SMB_FS isn't asked about and > therefor isn't set at all, s

[PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in -- Take 2

2000-10-19 Thread Tom Rini
Hello again all. I've taken what Petr suggested and put into a patch. Now, are there any suggestions this time around? I'm still wondering if the whole thing shouldn't be dependant on CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT, but since I don't know the smbfs code at all, I can't say. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http:

Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in

2000-10-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 08:29:47PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > It is not correct. At first, duplicated define_bool breaks xconfig (AFAIK), > and worse, first test is ignored at all by your code. Maybe something > like (untested) > > if [ "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" = "m" -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" = "y" ]; the

Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in

2000-10-19 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 19 Oct 00 at 11:00, Tom Rini wrote: > --- fs/nls/Config.in.orig Thu Oct 19 09:11:48 2000 > +++ fs/nls/Config.inThu Oct 19 09:49:53 2000 > @@ -4,8 +4,13 @@ > > # msdos and Joliet want NLS > if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \ > - -o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$

Re: [PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in

2000-10-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 07:55:42PM +0200, Sven Krohlas wrote: > Hello, > > > Hello all. The attached patch changes the behavoir of fs/nls/Config.in from: > > There's nothing attached...? D'oh. Look now. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ --- fs/nls/Config.in.orig

[PATCH] fs/nls/Config.in

2000-10-19 Thread Tom Rini
Hello all. The attached patch changes the behavoir of fs/nls/Config.in from: CONFIG_SMB_FS != n to CONFIG_INET = y && CONFIG_SMB_FS != n. This is neeed because if CONFIG_INET isn't set, CONFIG_SMB_FS isn't asked about and therefor isn't set at all, so CONFIG_NLS is set to y. My only question ab