Hello again all. I've taken what Petr suggested and put into a patch. Now,
are there any suggestions this time around? I'm still wondering if the whole
thing shouldn't be dependant on CONFIG_SMB_NLS_DEFAULT, but since I don't know
the smbfs code at all, I can't say.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
--- fs/nls/Config.in.orig Thu Oct 19 12:54:09 2000
+++ fs/nls/Config.in Thu Oct 19 12:54:32 2000
@@ -2,10 +2,17 @@
# Native language support configuration
#
+# smb wants NLS
+if [ "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" = "m" -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" = "y" ]; then
+ define_bool CONFIG_SMB_NLS y
+else
+ define_bool CONFIG_SMB_NLS n
+fi
+
# msdos and Joliet want NLS
if [ "$CONFIG_JOLIET" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_FAT_FS" != "n" \
-o "$CONFIG_NTFS_FS" != "n" -o "$CONFIG_NCPFS_NLS" = "y" \
- -o "$CONFIG_SMB_FS" != "n" ]; then
+ -o "$CONFIG_SMB_NLS" = "y" ]; then
define_bool CONFIG_NLS y
else
define_bool CONFIG_NLS n
