On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 14:40 +1100, Ian Munsie wrote:
> Excerpts from Rasmus Villemoes's message of 2015-02-21 00:26:22 +1100:
> > C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
> > or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
> > however, treats this
Excerpts from Rasmus Villemoes's message of 2015-02-21 00:26:22 +1100:
> C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
> or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
> however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also
> says that if
C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also
says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be
printed. Even if the k
3 matches
Mail list logo
