On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:38:03 + Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:32:17AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 12/16/2015 10:33 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > >On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >>On 12/16/2015 08:36 AM, Ji
On 12/16/2015 11:38 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:32:17AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 12/16/2015 10:33 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 12/16/2015 08:36 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
And in f
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:32:17AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 10:33 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >>On 12/16/2015 08:36 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >>>And in fact, clocksource_mmio_readw_down() also has simi
On 12/16/2015 10:33 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 12/16/2015 08:36 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
And in fact, clocksource_mmio_readw_down() also has similar issue, but it masks
with c->mask before return, the c->mask is less th
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:21:55AM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 08:36 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >And in fact, clocksource_mmio_readw_down() also has similar issue, but it
> >masks
> >with c->mask before return, the c->mask is less than 32 bit (because the
> >clocksource_mmio_init
On 12/16/2015 08:36 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:28:07 +0800 wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:11:25 +0800
Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Dear Daniel,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:59:30 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 11/25/2015 04:42 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Let's assume the counter value
On 12/16/2015 08:11 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Dear Daniel,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:59:30 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 11/25/2015 04:42 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Let's assume the counter value is 0xf00, the pistachio clocksource
read cycles function would return 0x0fff, but it s
On 12/16/2015 08:28 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:11:25 +0800
Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Dear Daniel,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:59:30 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 11/25/2015 04:42 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Let's assume the counter value is 0xf00, the pistachio clocksource
o
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:36:09 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:28:07 +0800 wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:11:25 +0800
> > Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Daniel,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:59:30 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 11/25/2015 0
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:28:07 +0800 wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:11:25 +0800
> Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>
> > Dear Daniel,
> >
> > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:59:30 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/25/2015 04:42 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > Let's assume the counter value is 0xf00
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:11:25 +0800
Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:59:30 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> > On 11/25/2015 04:42 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > Let's assume the counter value is 0xf00, the pistachio clocksource
oops, sorry, should be 0xf00
Dear Daniel,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:59:30 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/25/2015 04:42 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > Let's assume the counter value is 0xf00, the pistachio clocksource
> > read cycles function would return 0x0fff, but it should
> > return 0xfff.
> >
> > We
On 11/25/2015 04:42 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
Let's assume the counter value is 0xf00, the pistachio clocksource
read cycles function would return 0x0fff, but it should
return 0xfff.
We fix this issue by calculating bitwise-not counter, then cast to
cycle_t.
Signed-off-by: Ji
Let's assume the counter value is 0xf00, the pistachio clocksource
read cycles function would return 0x0fff, but it should
return 0xfff.
We fix this issue by calculating bitwise-not counter, then cast to
cycle_t.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang
---
drivers/clocksource/time-pist
14 matches
Mail list logo
