On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:36:09 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:28:07 +0800 wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:11:25 +0800
> > Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Daniel,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:59:30 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 11/25/2015 04:42 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > > Let's assume the counter value is 0xf000000, the pistachio
> > > > > clocksource
> >
> > oops, sorry, should be 0xf0000000. Do I need to send a v2 patch?
>
> And in fact, clocksource_mmio_readw_down() also has similar issue, but it
> masks
oops, sorry, I really need a cup of coffee. I mean clocksource_mmio_readl_down()
> with c->mask before return, the c->mask is less than 32 bit (because the
> clocksource_mmio_init think number of valid bits > 32 or < 16 is invalid.)
> the higher 32 bits are masked off, so we never saw such issue. But we'd better
> to fix that, what's your opinion?
>
> Thank you very much,
> Jisheng
>
> >
> > > > > read cycles function would return 0xffffffff0fffffff, but it should
> > > > > return 0xfffffff.
> > > > >
> > > > > We fix this issue by calculating bitwise-not counter, then cast to
> > > > > cycle_t.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszh...@marvell.com>
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jisheng,
> > > >
> > > > I tried to reproduce this behavior on x86_64 but without success.
> > > >
> > > > On which architecture did you produce this result ? Do you have a
> > > > simple
> > > > test program to check with ?
> > >
> > > I have no HW platforms with pistachio, just read the code and run the
> > > following test code in x86_64 and x86_32:
> > >
> > > #include <stdio.h>
> > > unsigned long long pistachio_clocksource_read_cycles()
> > > {
> > > unsigned int counter = 0xf000000;
> >
> > should be unsigned int counter = 0xf0000000;
> >
> > > return ~(unsigned long long)counter;
> > > }
> > > int main()
> > > {
> > > printf("%llx\n", pistachio_clocksource_read_cycles());
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jisheng
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
