On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:40:14PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:35:36AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:35:36AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > On
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:35:36AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at
> > > l
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at
> > least
> > one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing
On 09/16/2012 07:31 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least
one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get.
Russell what's
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least
> one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get.
> Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circum
On 09/12/2012 03:32 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 12/09/12 00:50, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 16:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>>> On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> [...]
> OK,
On 12/09/12 00:50, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 16:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
[...]
OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:44:06PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>[...]
> >> OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'd
> >> just acked the patc
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 16:44 +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>[...]
> >> OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'd
> >> just acked the patch rathe
On 09/10/2012 02:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
>>[...]
>> OK, that's what I'd thought was going on - it was the fact that you'd
>> just acked the patch rather than asked for it to go to the patch tracker
>> or something which ma
Hi Lars-Peter,
On 10/09/12 01:01, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
The managed clk functions are currently only available when the generic clk
lookup framework is build. But the managed clk functions are merely wrappers
around clk_get and clk_put and do not depend on any specifics of the generic
lookup
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:20:21AM +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:15:24AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > Note that the patch system doesn't always return error messages anymore
> > (it used to do that reliably, but as it's now a favourite target for
> > spammers a
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:15:24AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:59AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I posted a patch for this (clk: Move devm_ APIs out of clkdev into
> > HAVE_CLK) towards the end of the last release cycle and I think reposted
> > it since a
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:50:59AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>
> > The managed clk functions are currently only available when the generic clk
> > lookup framework is build. But the managed clk functions are merely wrappers
> > a
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> The managed clk functions are currently only available when the generic clk
> lookup framework is build. But the managed clk functions are merely wrappers
> around clk_get and clk_put and do not depend on any specifics of the ge
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> The managed clk functions are currently only available when the generic clk
> lookup framework is build. But the managed clk functions are merely wrappers
> around clk_get and clk_put and do not depend on any specifics of the gen
The managed clk functions are currently only available when the generic clk
lookup framework is build. But the managed clk functions are merely wrappers
around clk_get and clk_put and do not depend on any specifics of the generic
lookup functions and there are still quite a few custom implementatio
19 matches
Mail list logo
