On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at > > least > > one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing > > devm_clk_get. > > Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circumstances > > it > > makes sense to let it go through the m68k tree. > > Ok, I've merged it but there was no indication in the patch that it was > supposed to be a fix... there's no cc: to stable. Does it need to go to > stable? When was this brokenness introduced? What's the story for the > m68k bit?
What tree is this supposed to go through? I've checked your ARM tree as well as Mike's clock tree but neither seem to carry this patch. The reason I ask is because I want to take a patch series that converts the Unicore32 PWM code to the PWM framework into linux-next but it depends on this patch as well. Thierry
pgpwgMxSO4cHd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
