Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-22 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Jan 22 2007 10:41, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >as opposed to the 100+ *other* definitions currently cluttering up the >tree, which this patch would allow to be deleted *immediately*. > >forget it. i can see this argument is going nowhere and that, six >months from now, some poor sucker is going

Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 06:02 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > > > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > > by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to > > > > types.h, you should then (theoret

Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-22 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 06:02 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to > > > types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over > > > 100 instances of tho

Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-22 Thread Nick Piggin
Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: Robert P. J. Day wrote: by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over 100 instances of those same macros being *defined* throughout the source tree.

Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to > > types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over > > 100 instances of those same macros being *defined* throughout the > > source tree. you're not

Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-22 Thread Nick Piggin
Robert P. J. Day wrote: by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over 100 instances of those same macros being *defined* throughout the source tree. you're not going to be deleting the hundreds and hundreds of *uses*

Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-21 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Nicholas Miell wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can > > stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the > > source tree that clashes with that change. > If you'r

Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-21 Thread Richard Knutsson
Nicholas Miell wrote: On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source tree that clashes with that change. If you're going to introduce true

Re: [PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-21 Thread Nicholas Miell
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 05:03 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can > stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source > tree that clashes with that change. > If you're going to introduce true and false macros, you sho

[PATCH] Introduce simple TRUE and FALSE boolean macros.

2007-01-21 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Introduce the TRUE and FALSE boolean macros so that everyone can stop re-inventing them, and remove the one occurrence in the source tree that clashes with that change. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- once this patch is applied, others can remove all of the superfluo