On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > by adding (temporarily) the definitions of TRUE and FALSE to > > types.h, you should then (theoretically) be able to delete over > > 100 instances of those same macros being *defined* throughout the > > source tree. you're not going to be deleting the hundreds and > > hundreds of *uses* of TRUE and FALSE (not yet, anyway) but, at the > > very least, by adding two lines to types.h, you can delete all > > those redundant *definitions* and make sure that nothing breaks. > > (it shouldn't, of course, but it's always nice to be sure.) > > Doesn't seem very worthwhile, and it legitimises this definition > we're trying to get rid of.
hmmmmmmmm ... apparently, you totally missed my use of the important word "temporarily": $ grep -r "temporary hack" . | wc -l 16 rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
