Re: [PATCH] Fix for I-Opener IDE problems

2000-09-30 Thread Alex Stewart
Andre Hedrick wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Alex Stewart wrote: > > > The attached patch (against 2.4.0-test8) adjusts the code to only mark > > the slave not present if a flashdisk is master, not vice-versa. > > So are you saying that the master is flash and slave is ATA? No, that's not wha

Re: [PATCH] Fix for I-Opener IDE problems

2000-09-30 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Alex Stewart wrote: > The attached patch (against 2.4.0-test8) adjusts the code to only mark > the slave not present if a flashdisk is master, not vice-versa. So are you saying that the master is flash and slave is ATA? Did you read the ide.c about ()->ata_flash flags? All

[PATCH] Fix for I-Opener IDE problems

2000-09-30 Thread Alex Stewart
Attached is a patch which fixes the boot problems on I-Opener hardware. The problem is not the IDE chipset, as some had assumed, but rather the SanDisk flash disk. Since flashdisks typically don't have slaves, there is code in the kernel to avoid checking for a slave disk if a flashdisk is detec