On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 06:56 +, 함명주 wrote:
> > From: anish kumar
> >
> > Instead of "const char **supported_cable" it is better to have
> > it as "const char *const *supported_cable".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: anish kumar
>
> Could you please elaborate on why it's better?
>
> (Is this fixing
> From: anish kumar
>
> Instead of "const char **supported_cable" it is better to have
> it as "const char *const *supported_cable".
>
> Signed-off-by: anish kumar
Could you please elaborate on why it's better?
(Is this fixing the using the standard naming issue Mark mentioned before?)
Chee
From: anish kumar
Instead of "const char **supported_cable" it is better to have
it as "const char *const *supported_cable".
Signed-off-by: anish kumar
---
include/linux/extcon.h |2 +-
include/linux/extcon/extcon-adc-jack.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 de
3 matches
Mail list logo