Hi Borislav,
On 10/01/2014 12:27 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:18:04PM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/commit/?id=e245e3b25f9ef33b166f0f01d19d6418f52ae726
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> Its on its way upstream.
>> It didn't g
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:24:03PM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag
>
> It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
Queued for 3.19,
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 12:18:04PM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/commit/?id=e245e3b25f9ef33b166f0f01d19d6418f52ae726
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Its on its way upstream.
>
> It didn't get merged indeed.
Did you actually check?
$ git describe e2
This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag
It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
---
drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 8
drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff -
On 03/05/2014 07:49 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:04:37AM +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>> My patch still applies to 3.14-rc5, which means that mpc85xx_edac is
>> still there.
>>
>> I'd like to get rid of this patch for good ;)
> Something like that, right:
>
> https://
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 06:15:18AM +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 07:49 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:04:37AM +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> >> My patch still applies to 3.14-rc5, which means that mpc85xx_edac is
> >> still there.
> >>
> >> I'd like
On 03/05/2014 07:49 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:04:37AM +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>> My patch still applies to 3.14-rc5, which means that mpc85xx_edac is
>> still there.
>>
>> I'd like to get rid of this patch for good ;)
> Something like that, right:
>
> https://
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 06:04:37AM +0100, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> My patch still applies to 3.14-rc5, which means that mpc85xx_edac is
> still there.
>
> I'd like to get rid of this patch for good ;)
Something like that, right:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/commit/?i
Hi Johannes,
On 10/14/2013 11:56 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> mpc85xx_edac has them already removed in the version that is going into 3.13.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience. I'll set up a public tree at my github repo, so
> everyone can see the current mpc85xx_edac state.
Any n
Hi Johannes,
On 10/14/2013 11:56 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> mpc85xx_edac has them already removed in the version that is going into 3.13.
>
> Sorry for the inconvenience. I'll set up a public tree at my github repo, so
> everyone can see the current mpc85xx_edac state.
Thank y
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 07:17:57AM +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag
>
> It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
> ---
> drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 7 +++
> drivers/edac/
This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag
It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
---
drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c | 7 +++
drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 8
drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed
12 matches
Mail list logo
