This patch proposes to remove the use of the IRQF_DISABLED flag

It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenac...@free-electrons.com>
---
 drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 8 ++++----
 drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c  | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
index 542fad70e360..6366e880f978 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int mv64x60_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
                                       pdata->irq,
                                       mv64x60_pci_isr,
-                                      IRQF_DISABLED,
+                                      0,
                                       "[EDAC] PCI err",
                                       pci);
                if (res < 0) {
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static int mv64x60_sram_err_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
                                       pdata->irq,
                                       mv64x60_sram_isr,
-                                      IRQF_DISABLED,
+                                      0,
                                       "[EDAC] SRAM err",
                                       edac_dev);
                if (res < 0) {
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static int mv64x60_cpu_err_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
                                       pdata->irq,
                                       mv64x60_cpu_isr,
-                                      IRQF_DISABLED,
+                                      0,
                                       "[EDAC] CPU err",
                                       edac_dev);
                if (res < 0) {
@@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ static int mv64x60_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                res = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
                                       pdata->irq,
                                       mv64x60_mc_isr,
-                                      IRQF_DISABLED,
+                                      0,
                                       "[EDAC] MC err",
                                       mci);
                if (res < 0) {
diff --git a/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c b/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
index ef6b7e08f485..702394419f6a 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/ppc4xx_edac.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ static int ppc4xx_edac_register_irq(struct 
platform_device *op,
 
        status = request_irq(ded_irq,
                             ppc4xx_edac_isr,
-                            IRQF_DISABLED,
+                            0,
                             "[EDAC] MC ECCDED",
                             mci);
 
@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ static int ppc4xx_edac_register_irq(struct 
platform_device *op,
 
        status = request_irq(sec_irq,
                             ppc4xx_edac_isr,
-                            IRQF_DISABLED,
+                            0,
                             "[EDAC] MC ECCSEC",
                             mci);
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to