Re: [PATCH] ACPI/SRAT: fix SRAT order parsing when both LAPIC and X2APIC present

2016-04-21 Thread Lukasz Anaczkowski
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 2:08 AM > The changelog describes the problem (good), but it doesn't say anything > about the mitigation (not good). You should say something about what the > patch does to address the issue, like "To address that p

Re: [PATCH] ACPI/SRAT: fix SRAT order parsing when both LAPIC and X2APIC present

2016-04-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, April 07, 2016 10:21:28 AM Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote: > SRAT maps APIC ID to proximity domains ids. Mapping from proximity > domain ids to NUMA node ids is based on order of entries in SRAT table. > SRAT table has just LAPIC entires or mix of LAPIC and X2APIC entries. > As long as there

[PATCH] ACPI/SRAT: fix SRAT order parsing when both LAPIC and X2APIC present

2016-04-07 Thread Lukasz Anaczkowski
SRAT maps APIC ID to proximity domains ids. Mapping from proximity domain ids to NUMA node ids is based on order of entries in SRAT table. SRAT table has just LAPIC entires or mix of LAPIC and X2APIC entries. As long as there are only LAPIC entires, mapping from proximity domain id to NUMA node id