From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 2:08 AM > The changelog describes the problem (good), but it doesn't say anything > about the mitigation (not good). You should say something about what the > patch does to address the issue, like "To address that problem, do X".
Thanks, Rafael. Sending v2 of the patch with extended commit message. > Looking at the code, the idea is to check each entry against both LAPIC and > X2APIC in table order so as to cause them to be mapped in that order too, > right? Yes, that is correct. Thanks, Lukasz
