On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:22:01PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > And there's no working alternative to build/config
> > system. Thus, let me have my try OK? Thanks!
>
> I would prefer if you used your time to do small incrmental improvements
> to what we have today rather then rewriting from
>
> And there's no working alternative to build/config
> system. Thus, let me have my try OK? Thanks!
I would prefer if you used your time to do small incrmental improvements
to what we have today rather then rewriting from scratch.
But it's your decision and not mine.
Sam
-
To unsubscr
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:59:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > > > Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncur
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:59:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > > Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncurses community of my
> > > > mainly `TERM=linux
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:59:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncurses community of my
> > > mainly `TERM=linux ; sed && sh' approach is more important for me.
> >
> > There is noon
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:59:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncurses community of my
> > mainly `TERM=linux ; sed && sh' approach is more important for me.
>
> There is noone having trouble with ncurses dependency today.
Who wants to meet a zo
> Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncurses community of my
> mainly `TERM=linux ; sed && sh' approach is more important for me.
There is noone having trouble with ncurses dependency today.
And perl is not yet mandatory for a kernel build expect
for a few architectures.
m4 is not us
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 09:03:00AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> > Thanks. I will be specific, after i will finish, what i already have,
> > to make air a bit less hot. Of course everything will be back
> > compatible, so nothing to worry about (
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> Thanks. I will be specific, after i will finish, what i already have,
> to make air a bit less hot. Of course everything will be back
> compatible, so nothing to worry about (the rewrite).
Qutie frankly, this kind of "I'll tell you more when I'm done"
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 04:35:41AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> > Today's kconfig was proposed and accepted in a very unpleasant
> > circumstances, has very poor design, development and no working
> > alternative (for 5+ years now).
>
> If you w
Hi,
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> Today's kconfig was proposed and accepted in a very unpleasant
> circumstances, has very poor design, development and no working
> alternative (for 5+ years now).
If you want to make such statements, you have to offer a little more than
the hot air y
On Monday 01 October 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> * Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:12:51 -0600
>
> > On Thursday 27 September 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >> On Saturday 29 September 2007 00:34, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >> > > > God I hate select.
> >> > >
> >> > > I
Hi Oleg.
>
> Today's kconfig was proposed and accepted in a very unpleasant
> circumstances, has very poor design, development and no working
> alternative (for 5+ years now).
I have read all your mails about this subject - but I still miss what
is so bad about current design.
Could you try to s
* Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:12:51 -0600
> On Thursday 27 September 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> On Saturday 29 September 2007 00:34, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>> > > > God I hate select.
>> > >
>> > > IMO a better implementation would result in a notification /
>
On Thursday 27 September 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Saturday 29 September 2007 00:34, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > God I hate select.
> > >
> > > IMO a better implementation would result in a notification /
confirmation
> > > of turning on new items,
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:05:33 +1000
> Sure, that would probably be pretty trivial to implement too, and
> would solve most problems for kernel devs.
>
> At a level up from that, I think ease of use could be improved with
> a package manager-type chained-selection/deselection feature in
> the config
On Saturday 29 September 2007 00:34, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > God I hate select.
> >
> > IMO a better implementation would result in a notification / confirmation
> > of turning on new items, and the ability to deselect options which will
> > also confir
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > God I hate select.
>
> IMO a better implementation would result in a notification / confirmation of
> turning on new items, and the ability to deselect options which will also
> confirm to deselect dependants. Like most other systems that have simi
On Thursday 20 September 2007 16:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I struggled for five minutes trying to work out how to make CONFIG_SYSCTL
> go away and gave up in disgust.
>
> God I hate select.
IMO a better implementation would result in a notification / confirmation of
turning on new items, and the
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:31:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:05:37 +0200 Andreas Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL:
> >
> > ...
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > net/built-in.o: In function `init_p9':
> > net/9p/mod.c:59: un
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:05:37 +0200 Andreas Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL:
>
> ...
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> net/built-in.o: In function `init_p9':
> net/9p/mod.c:59: undefined reference to `p9_sysctl_register'
> net/built-in.o: In function `exit_p
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 08:53:19PM +0200, roel wrote:
> Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > Fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL:
> >
> > ...
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > net/built-in.o: In function `init_p9':
> > net/9p/mod.c:59: undefined reference to `p9_sysctl_register'
> > net/built-in.o: In fu
Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> Fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL:
>
> ...
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> net/built-in.o: In function `init_p9':
> net/9p/mod.c:59: undefined reference to `p9_sysctl_register'
> net/built-in.o: In function `exit_p9':
> net/9p/mod.c:75: undefined reference to `p9_sysctl
Fix compile error if !CONFIG_SYSCTL:
...
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
net/built-in.o: In function `init_p9':
net/9p/mod.c:59: undefined reference to `p9_sysctl_register'
net/built-in.o: In function `exit_p9':
net/9p/mod.c:75: undefined reference to `p9_sysctl_unregister'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] E
24 matches
Mail list logo
