On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:47:21PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 08:59:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > Maintenance and acceptance of the m4/make/perl/C/ncurses community of my > > > > mainly `TERM=linux ; sed && sh' approach is more important for me. > > > > > > There is noone having trouble with ncurses dependency today. > > > > Who wants to meet a zombie anyway? > > Finding quotes from old threads does not in any way prove your point.
This makes air hot for Roman. I want to prove my point not by words. But have to reply with something on my side, until i have work done. [] > And until now you have not given one single example of real > problems that will be solved by a total rewrite and cannot > be solved otherwise. If you didn't see them in that, what i've posted, then i just have to say: i don't need to give anything. There are kvm, lguest, xen with ext2, ext3, xfs, etc. And there's no working alternative to build/config system. Thus, let me have my try OK? Thanks! Bye. ____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
