On 8/7/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My PCI domains patch add support for multiple peer root buses. That's
> the definition of PCI domain support.
one one segment, we can not have multi peer root buses?
>
> Branch 'pciseg' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarz
On 8/7/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > the sysdata stuff try to fix:
> > when calgary iommu code was introduced, it is trying to share sysdata
> > that orginally is initialized k8_bus.c and used by pcibus_to_node. but
> > that only happen with AMD K8 platform. and
Yinghai Lu wrote:
the sysdata stuff try to fix:
when calgary iommu code was introduced, it is trying to share sysdata
that orginally is initialized k8_bus.c and used by pcibus_to_node. but
that only happen with AMD K8 platform. and have nothing to do with
calgary.
incorrect: sysdata is initial
On 8/7/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
>
> Strongly agreed. It overall fixes bugs that existing _before_ the
> sysdata stuff went in.
what are those bugs?
the sysdata stuff try to fix:
when calgary iommu code was introduced, it is trying to share sysdata
that
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:49:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I am sooo tired of this thing. Andi, someone, can we for heaven's
sake please just get it all sorted out?
With regards to the sysdata conversion: Riku says he cannot test new
kernel. I haven't heard any
On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 03:49:11PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I am sooo tired of this thing. Andi, someone, can we for heaven's
> sake please just get it all sorted out?
With regards to the sysdata conversion: Riku says he cannot test new
kernel. I haven't heard anything from Andy Whitcro
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:53:07 +0300
Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch finishes the i386 and x86-64 ->sysdata conversion and
> hopefully also fixes Riku's and Andy's observed bugs. It is based on
> Yinghai Lu's and Andy Whitcroft's patches (thanks!) with some changes:
>
> - int
On 8/5/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)
> > x86_pci_scan_root_bus(int bus)
> > {
> > pci_scan_bus_on_node(bus, &pci_root_ops, -1);
> > }
> >
> > i need node as one param for my patch later in irq.c and
Yinghai Lu wrote:
pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)
x86_pci_scan_root_bus(int bus)
{
pci_scan_bus_on_node(bus, &pci_root_ops, -1);
}
i need node as one param for my patch later in irq.c and legacy.c
It is a mistake to start coding NUMA details into pci scan functi
On 8/5/07, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:49:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> > Can you change
> > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno)
> > to
> > pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)?
>
> Do you anticipate passing in a different pci
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:49:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Can you change
> pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno)
> to
> pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)?
Do you anticipate passing in a different pci_ops or node?
In any case please remember I am aiming for the minim
On 8/5/07, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch finishes the i386 and x86-64 ->sysdata conversion and
> hopefully also fixes Riku's and Andy's observed bugs. It is based on
> Yinghai Lu's and Andy Whitcroft's patches (thanks!) with some changes:
>
> - introduce pci_scan_bus_with_
This patch finishes the i386 and x86-64 ->sysdata conversion and
hopefully also fixes Riku's and Andy's observed bugs. It is based on
Yinghai Lu's and Andy Whitcroft's patches (thanks!) with some changes:
- introduce pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata() and use it instead of
pci_scan_bus() where appropri
13 matches
Mail list logo
