On 8/5/07, Muli Ben-Yehuda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:49:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> > Can you change
> > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno)
> > to
> > pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)?
>
> Do you anticipate passing in a different pci_ops or node?
> In any case please remember I am aiming for the minimal "obviously
> correc" change for 2.6.23...
>
> > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno) make me feel that i need feed one
> > sysdata as on param for it.
>
> Yeah, lousy name, but the best I came up with. Runner up was
> 'x86_pci_scan_bus', which is I think worse?
>
or
pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)
x86_pci_scan_root_bus(int bus)
{
pci_scan_bus_on_node(bus, &pci_root_ops, -1);
}
i need node as one param for my patch later in irq.c and legacy.c
YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
