On 2018/8/13 20:42, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 05:26:49PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
On 2018/8/13 12:18, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:04:10AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
The kernel may sleep with holding a spinlock.
The function call paths (from botto
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 05:26:49PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>
>
> On 2018/8/13 12:18, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:04:10AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> >>The kernel may sleep with holding a spinlock.
> >>
> >>The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16 are:
>
On 2018/8/13 12:18, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:04:10AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
The kernel may sleep with holding a spinlock.
The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16 are:
[FUNC] schedule_timeout_interruptible
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c, 523: schedule_
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:04:10AM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The kernel may sleep with holding a spinlock.
>
> The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16 are:
>
> [FUNC] schedule_timeout_interruptible
> kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c, 523: schedule_timeout_interruptible in
> srcu_read_d
The kernel may sleep with holding a spinlock.
The function call paths (from bottom to top) in Linux-4.16 are:
[FUNC] schedule_timeout_interruptible
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c, 523: schedule_timeout_interruptible in
srcu_read_delay
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c, 1105: [FUNC_PTR]srcu_read_delay in
rcu_to
5 matches
Mail list logo