Hi,
Shaohua Li wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 23:16 +0200, matthieu castet wrote:
There are drivers/acpi/motherboard.c that done some stuff already handle
by pnp/system.c.
Yes, it should be disabled if pnpacpi is enabled.
But even if pnpacpi is disabled, pnp/system.c sould work with pnpbios.
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Thursday 04 August 2005 6:38 am, matthieu castet wrote:
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 3:16 pm, matthieu castet wrote:
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
drivers/char/hpet.c
This probably should be converted to PNP. I'll
On Thursday 04 August 2005 6:38 am, matthieu castet wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 August 2005 3:16 pm, matthieu castet wrote:
> >>Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> > drivers/char/hpet.c
> >> > This probably should be converted to PNP. I'll
> >> > look into doing this
Hi,
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 3:16 pm, matthieu castet wrote:
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>drivers/char/hpet.c
>This probably should be converted to PNP. I'll
>look into doing this.
IIRC, I am not sure that the pnp layer was able to pass the 64 bits
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 23:16 +0200, matthieu castet wrote:
>
> There are drivers/acpi/motherboard.c that done some stuff already handle
> by pnp/system.c.
Yes, it should be disabled if pnpacpi is enabled. The only concern is
motherboard.c also request some ACPI resources, which might not declaim
i
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 09:20 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 7:01 pm, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:55 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > Any objections to the patch below? I posted it last Wednesday,
> > > but haven't heard anything. Once we have this fix,
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 3:16 pm, matthieu castet wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 August 2005 7:01 pm, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >>Did you have plan to remove other
> >>legacy acpi drivers?
> > No, I didn't -- which ones are you thinking about? Looking at
> > the callers of acpi_
Hi,
Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 August 2005 7:01 pm, Shaohua Li wrote:
>
>
>>Did you have plan to remove other
>>legacy acpi drivers?
>
>
> No, I didn't -- which ones are you thinking about? Looking at
> the callers of acpi_bus_register_driver(), I see:
looking for METHOD_NAME__CRS is
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 7:01 pm, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 09:55 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Any objections to the patch below? I posted it last Wednesday,
> > but haven't heard anything. Once we have this fix, 8250_pnp
> > should have sufficient functionality that we can ge
9 matches
Mail list logo
