On Thursday 04 August 2005 6:38 am, matthieu castet wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 August 2005 3:16 pm, matthieu castet wrote:
> >>Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> >  drivers/char/hpet.c
> >> >          This probably should be converted to PNP.  I'll
> >> >          look into doing this.
> >>IIRC, I am not sure that the pnp layer was able to pass the 64 bits 
> >>memory adress for hpet correctly. But it would be nice if it works.
> > 
> > You're right, this was broken.  But I've been pushing a PNPACPI
> > patch to fix this.
> > 
> Yes but is ACPI_RSTYPE_ADDRESS64 possible on 32 bit machine ?

I can't think of a case where that would make sense, but I don't
actually know the answer.

> In this case your patch won't work as res->mem_resource[i].start and 
> res->mem_resource[i].end are unsigned long, and 64 bit value won't fit.

True.  But fixing that would be pretty far-reaching (changing struct
resource), so I'm not worried until it is shown to be a problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to