On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 06:32:16PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2001 18:16, Colonel wrote:
> > Had you tried fvwm-1.24r (the original) ? It was designed long ago to
> > be lean and fast on the desktop. I know it whips KDE.
>
> Yes, I did. It's even faster than xfce but the
On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 08:05:41PM +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:21:18PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Name one thing Microsoft actually invented. Other than Microsoft Bob.
>
> were listed and where they bought or stole it from. The only things
> that were really Micr
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:58:33PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> At 23:50 +1000 2001-06-21, john slee wrote:
> >i believe libgpio uses the existing usb/iee1394/serial/parallel
> >interfaces to provide a limited userspace driver capability.
>
> That only means, howev
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 06:38:09PM +0700, Dmitry A. Fedorov wrote:
> kernel module to delivery hardware interrupts to user space
> programs. Hardware interrupts (IRQ) are accessible by
> character devices /dev/irq[0-15]. Interrupts delivered by
> signals and select(2)/poll(2)
i believe libgpio us
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 08:04:42PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
[ ... ]
> I asked Linus for this a long time ago and he pointed out that you couldn't
> make it work over NFS, at least not nicely. It does seem like that could
> be worked around by having a "poll daemon" which knew about all the thi
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 06:02:12PM +0200, Dr. Michael Weller wrote:
> It's an interesting experiment actually: Is the linux community powerful
> enough to force vendors/people to fix their products and deploy updates to
> comply to standards or can they just ignore it.
largely the vendors have fi
On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Urban Widmark wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2001, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> > the NEW tag). That phase ended almost a month ago. Nobody who has
> > actually tried the CML2 tools more recently has reported that the UI
> > changes present any difficulty.
>
>
> quite a bit of scope for improvement. Commercial caching systems have
> demonstrated thoughput of thousands of requests/s with similar
> hardware, but I suspect Tux-ification of Squid will be necessary to
not at all, search for X15 in april/may linux-kernel archives. most of
the specific impr
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 03:19:20AM +1000, john slee wrote:
> it sounded like a challenge. this might help someone who can't be
and it might be even more helpful if it didnt appear with a stupid
mimetype.
attempt #2
--
"Bobby, jiggle Grandpa's rat so it looks alive, plea
acting all the data by hand. it spits it out in tab
delimited form, as sanely as i could manage in 5 minutes.
j.
--
"Bobby, jiggle Grandpa's rat so it looks alive, please" -- gary larson
#!/bin/sh
# john slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Sat Apr 21 03:17:55 EST 2001
#
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 07:07:20PM -0700, Colonel wrote:
> Some ISPs rely on crap software & OS to process email, and have other
so you don't use those ISPs
> bad habits besides. Censorship usually does more bad than good
> (especially since dealing with 80% of the spam is trivial for
> procmai
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 01:22:48AM -0800, Richard Gooch wrote:
> Linus Torvalds writes:
>
> Ho, hum. No, he didn't. It's April Wankers^WFools again.
we aussies are supposed to have a good sense of humour :P
j.
--
"Bobby, jiggle Grandpa's rat so it looks alive, please" -- gary larson
-
To unsu
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 06:44:20PM +0300, Radu Greab wrote:
> Sorry if this is already known: on a RH 7.0 system with kernel 2.4.2
> or 2.4.3, a select on an unconnected socket incorrectly says that the
> socket is ready for input and output. Of course, reading from the socket
> file descriptor re
[cc list trimmed]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:10:08PM +0100, Sean Hunter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 06:08:15AM -0600, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> > Sure - very simple. If the execute bit is set on a file, don't allow
> > ANY write to the file. This does modify the permission bits slightly
> > but
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 12:06:30PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> o Fix i386 #ifdef bug with notsc disable (Anton Blanchard)
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/kernel/2.4.2-ac23/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mar
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:52:41PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
>
> > Bloat removal: being able to run without /proc mounted.
> >
> > We don't have "kernel speed". We have kernel-mode screwing around
> > with text formatting.
>
> Sounds like you migh
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 02:51:42PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> So, in summary, what seems to me to be happening is that the high IRQs
> (9-13, say) appear to be unavailable for use by ISA cards on my
> machine, at the moment. The kernel allows ISA cards to claim these
> IRQs (and the cards then sh
against 2.4.1:
this may seem rather frivolous, but...
patch below makes all data lines start with the appropriate letter, a
colon, then a tab. previously some entries used (varying amounts of)
space characters instead of tabs.
--- MAINTAINERS.origSun Feb 18 01:48:03 2001
+++ MAINTAINERS Su
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:19:02PM +1100, john slee wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 07:33:53PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Does 2.4.1-ac9 behave ?
>
> yep, works fine.
let me amend this slightly: works fine when not using xfree86 with pci
s3virge. guess it wasnt the kernel at
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 07:33:53PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> Does 2.4.1-ac9 behave ?
hrm. it misbehaved on ac9 now. i'll try a different soundcard and see
what happens. is es1370 known to be relatively stable? i have one of
those lying about somewhere.
i'm fairly sure its not ram at fault, si
On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 07:33:53PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > it doesn't happen to me on 2.4.1-pre11 with andrew morton's low
> > scheduling latency patch.
>
> Does 2.4.1-ac9 behave ?
yep, works fine.
j.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
'mpg123 foo.mp3' triggers this. doesn't seem to be restricted to mpg123
however. happens with everything using /dev/dsp.
it doesn't happen to me on 2.4.1-pre11 with andrew morton's low
scheduling latency patch.
symptoms are hard lockup, and random noise from speakers. even magic
sysrq doesn't
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 12:07:28PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The crackling is not dependent on the buffer size you can set up in the C code.
> The crackling is dependent on the frequency of the sine. It's clearly audible
> (read: annoying) at 10kHz, audible at 1kHz, inaudible at 100Hz. So
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:42:48AM -0600, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Darren Tucker wrote:
> > I decided to try a shiny new 2.4.0 kernel but I couldn't configure the driver
> > for my etherworks3 ISA ethernet card (AMD K6III PC hardware).
> >
> > A bit of grepping showed that it only
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:53:54PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
> 2.4.0-ac11
> o Make de4x5 driver work (Nathan Hand)
sure this wasn't ewrk3? nathan posted a patch against ewrk3 driver a
while back, but not d
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 10:07:10AM -0500, Jonathan Earle wrote:
> > /*
> > * I tend to find standard C comments easier to read. They stand out,
> > * especially for multiple lines (although I always try to put the :end:
> > * on a separate line for clarity).
> > */
>
> I like this style for
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:55:37AM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm getting some strange reports with vmstat on a dual iPPro running 2.2.18,
> it doesnt happen very frequently, but i see it a lot when compiling something
> (kernel and mysql specially, not when compiling small stuff), though i
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 07:22:06PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>-
> - pre3:
> - Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz: sound and drm driver init fixes and
> cleanups
this breaks for me, gcc 2.95.2:
gus_midi.c:206: parse error before `gus_midi_init'
gus_midi.c:207: warning: return-type defaul
hardware:
* abit be6-2 mainboard
* 533 celeron (not overclocked)
* 192mb sdram
* seagate 20gb ide disk (not on ata66 port)
compiler: gcc version 2.95.2 2220 (Debian GNU/Linux)
it gets as far as uncompressing the kernel and trying to boo
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 03:06:25AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> Ingo, This original thread was regarding Linux vs. NetWare 5.x performance
> metrics and responses from Linux folks about how to affect and
> improve them, not a diatribe on the features of TUX.
while beating netware in certain a
the only reason i suggested this was the init=/bin/bash, 4MB
> > RAM, no swap emergency-bootup case. We must not kill init in
> > that case - if the current code doesnt then great and none of
> > this is needed.
perhaps a boot time option oom=0 ? since oom is such a rare ca
o sounds very similar to [one use for] lvm snapshots. does hp-ux
have those too? (linux lvm documentation seems to say it [lvm] was
based on a similar hp-ux feature...)
j.
--
john slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
y* converts everything to
rtf. it's, well, yuk? :-(
j.
--
john slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
33 matches
Mail list logo
