Re: The latest Microsoft FUD. This time from BillG, himself.

2001-06-21 Thread chuckw
> > You can scream all you want that "it isn't free software" but the fact > > of the matter is that you all scream that and then go do your slides for > > your Linux talks in PowerPoint. > > I think this is an unfair generalization. Not really. In Linus's book he describes that his presentatio

Re: [BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss

2001-06-15 Thread chuckw
> You can fix this by upping the socket buffer that ping asks for (look > for setsockopt( ... SO_RCVBUF ...)) and then tuning the kernel to > allow larger socket buffers. The file to fiddle with is > /proc/sys/net/core/rmem_max. Currently it is set to 65535. I doubled it several times and each

[BUG] 2.2.19 -> 80% Packet Loss

2001-06-14 Thread chuckw
1. When pinging a machine using kernel 2.2.19 I consistently get an 80% packet loss when doing a ping -f with a packet size of 64590 or higher. 2. A "ping -f -s 64589" to a machine running kernel 2.2.19 results in 0% packet loss. By incrementing the packetsize by one "ping -f -s 64590" or high