Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in

On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 04:34:55PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > >If you'd aim for a small kernel image, you would build anything as a module > >that is not requred for booting. > > > Yes, there is a tradeoff for both. > > Example: > 16:30 ichi:../net/802 > l fc.o fc.ko > -rw-r--r-- 1 jenge

Re: programs vanish with 2.6.22+

On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Markus wrote: > Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to > everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a "Process 9246 detached", > nothing else is printed or written in the log. > > Markus Hallo Markus Whenever the connecti

Re: very very strange simultaneous RAID resync on sep 2, 01:06 CEST (+2)

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 09:56:10AM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > Hi, Hi Xavier > I have a server running with RAID5 disks, under debian/stable, kernel > 2.6.18-5-686. Yesterday the RAID resync'd for no apparent reason, > without even mdamd sending a mail to warn about that: > > Sep 2 01:06:01 a

Re: Hang in 2.6.23-rc5

On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 04:15:01AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > > Try this from net-2.6 tree: > > > > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c > > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c > > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static u32 tcp_rto_min(struct sock *sk) > > struct dst_entr

Re: SATA RAID5 speed drop of 100 MB/s

On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 12:07:23AM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 12:59:10PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > Concerning NCQ/no NCQ, without NCQ I get an additional 15-50MB/s in speed > > per various bonnie++ tests. > > There is more going on than a bad NCQ implementation of th

[PATCH] [RFC] Adjust queue unplugging and congestion limits

ifical benchmarksi, mostly tar, dd and cp (also to NFS). Comments are welcome. Best regards, Patrick Signed-Off-By: Patrick Mau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/block/ll_rw_blk.c b/block/ll_rw_blk.c index c99b463..aa26ff3 100644 --- a/block/ll_rw_blk.c +++ b/block/ll_rw_blk.c @@ -96,17

Re: 2.6.21.1 on Fedora Core 6 breaks LVM/vgscan

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 04:02:46PM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote: > On 21 May 2007 I wrote: > > > Attempting to compile a 2.6.21.1 kernel for use on a Fedora Core 6 box > > results in a panic at boot because the root filesystem can't be found. > > I have just compiled 2.6.22-rc2 with the configura

Re: RSDL for 2.6.21-rc3- 0.29

On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 03:43:09PM -0400, Douglas McNaught wrote: > Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Monday 12 March 2007, Douglas McNaught wrote: > >>Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I'd considered it, but with 32 dle entries, the whole strace output > >>> would be

Re: [PATCH] mm: fix page_mkclean_one (was: 2.6.19 file content corruption on ext3)

On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 01:32:49PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andrei Popa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-22 14:24]: > > With all three patches I have corruption > > I've completed one installation with Linus' patch plus the two from > Andrew successfully, but I'm currently trying again..

Question about "aic7yyy Domain Validation"

Hallo everyone, I have a small question regarding the Domain Validation debugging output from my machine. It has four identical IBM drives, two on each channel. There's always a message saying "target0:0:0: wide asynchronous.", even without "verbose" booting. But in the verbose output below, ther

Paket counters for aliased interfaces ?

Hello, I would like to use IP-Aliasing to create a private network between a few machines without buying more hardware. That's easy, but ifconfig tells me: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx inet addr:x.x.x.x Bcast:x.x.x.x Mask:x.x.x.x UP BROADCAST RUNN

Where's pre13-x.diff.gz ?

Hi all, just a small question. The pre13-x.diff.gz patches vanished from ftp.xx.kernel.org. I need pre13-5 and pre13-6 (and later, if there where any). They have not been moved to testing/old or something, hopefully they're not lost ? cheers, Patrick - To unsubscribe from this list: send the li

Re: 2.4.0-test9 3c59x still problems

On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 01:22:59AM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > After upgrade to > > 2.4.0-test9 > > 3c59x is still giving these messages: > > > > Oct 11 06:34:36 adglinux1 kernel: eth0: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status >e000. > > Oct 11 06:34:36 adglinu

/proc/sys/vm/freepages not writable.

Dear kernel-hackers, I compiled kernel 2.4.0test9-pre1 (kernel names are a real mess these days ...) and noticed that /proc/sys/vm/freepages is no longer writable: [root@oscar] ll /proc/sys/vm/freepages -r--r--r--1 root root0 Sep 17 02:25 /proc/sys/vm/freepages If this was i

Masking out one page of RAM because of bit-errors.

Dear list-readers, I have a bad SDRAM chip with exactly one bit error. Memtest86 shows that the bit error always occurs at the address 0x4eff508. I tried to calculate the page number and it should be 20223. I then looked at arch/i386/mm/init.c and found the function "page_is_ram". I added a test