Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

2007-07-31 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Em Terça, 31 de Julho de 2007 16:57, Matthew Hawkins escreveu: > On 7/31/07, Miguel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CFS does not requeue_task() on SCHED_YIELD (used by graphic drivers) as > > until 2.6.22 and -ck. Please try this hack [1] that makes -ck to behave

Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

2007-07-31 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
k. Please try this hack [1] that makes -ck to behave like CFS then you are comparing apples to apples. Details on the SCHED_YIELD implementation on [2]. Please correct it if it's wrong. 1 - http://www.debianpt.org/~elmig/pool/kernel/20070731/sched_yield_hack.patch 2 - http://bhhdoa.org.au/p

Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

2007-07-30 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
004 + 8 loops | 104 FPS > UT2004 + 9 loops | 94 FPS UT2004 + 9 loops | 89 FPS > UT2004 + 10 loops | 92 FPSUT2004 + 10 loops | 91 FPS can you apply the patch [1] that changes the behaviour of sched_yield on SD and report the results? SD should scale a lot better after the patc

Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

2007-07-30 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Em Segunda, 30 de Julho de 2007 19:38, Ingo Molnar escreveu: > * Miguel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in mainline (2.6.22): > > /** > > * sys_sched_yield - yield the current processor to other threads. > > * > > * This function yields the c

Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1)

2007-07-30 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
2 modes for this hack: sysctl kernel.sched_yield = 1 or 2, see patch. [...] > > Ingo > ___ > http://ck.kolivas.org/faqs/replying-to-mailing-list.txt > ck mailing list - mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://vds.kolivas.org/mailman/listinfo/ck

Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)

2007-06-15 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 schrieb Miguel Figueiredo: >> Hi all, >> >> some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found on >> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/massive_intr.c > > Hi Miquel, Ingo, Con! >

call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans)

2007-06-11 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
The machine was a Sempron64 3.0 GHz. I know that other people, who read lkml, also tested the same way, it would be nice if they also post their data. -- Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "

2.6.22-rc4-ck1 - Re: -ck patch | Feedback

2007-06-10 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Celso wrote: > Sáb, 2007-06-09 às 10:30 +0100, Miguel Figueiredo escreveu: >> Celso wrote: >>> Hello, I'm using -ck since... along time ago (I start using it with the >>> kernel 2.6.16) . I started using it with Ubuntu and the response of the >>> system w

Re: -ck patch | Feedback

2007-06-09 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
ements! -- Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48

2007-05-23 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Bill Davidsen wrote: Miguel Figueiredo wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: I was unable to reproduce the numbers Miguel generated, comments below. The -ck2 patch seems to run nicely, although the memory repopulation from swap would be most useful on system which have a lot of memory pressure. I

Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48

2007-05-23 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Bill Davidsen wrote: I was unable to reproduce the numbers Miguel generated, comments below. The -ck2 patch seems to run nicely, although the memory repopulation from swap would be most useful on system which have a lot of memory pressure. Bill Davidsen wrote: Miguel Figueiredo wrote: Hi

Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48

2007-05-22 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Bill Davidsen wrote: Miguel Figueiredo wrote: Ray Lee wrote: On 5/20/07, Miguel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As I tryied myself kernels 2.6.21, 2.6.21-cfs-v13, and 2.6.21-ck2 on the same machine i found *very* odd those numbers you posted, so i tested myself those kernels to s

Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48

2007-05-20 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Ray Lee wrote: On 5/20/07, Miguel Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As I tryied myself kernels 2.6.21, 2.6.21-cfs-v13, and 2.6.21-ck2 on the same machine i found *very* odd those numbers you posted, so i tested myself those kernels to see the numbers I get instead of talking about the

Re: Sched - graphic smoothness under load - cfs-v13 sd-0.48

2007-05-20 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
I am affraid your data it's wrong, there's no such big difference between the schedulers... -- Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a mes

Re: 2.6.21-ck1

2007-05-05 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
mprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

2.6.21 frozen for a few minutes, swapping to disk

2007-04-29 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
nfig dmesg: http://www.debianpt.org/~elmig/pool/kernel/20070429/dmesg As this is the first time it happened and it felt odd i am reporting. If aditional info is needed please CC me as i am not on the list. -- Com os melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianP