this becomes a busy-wait loop,
>> schedule() in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE won't block.
>
> And that's game over for a uniprocessor non-preempt machine, yes?
>
>> Reported-by: Guy Streeter
>
> And what did Guy report? "that looks screwy"? "my machin
On 8/15/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guy Streeter wrote:
> > On 6/1/06, James Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>> I think this is the wrong approach.
> >>>
> >>> Many of these sho
1776,10 @@
> inode->i_op = &proc_mem_inode_operations;
> inode->i_fop = &proc_mem_operations;
> break;
> + case PROC_TID_ENVIRON:
> + case PROC_TGID_ENVIRON:
> + inode->i_fop = &proc_env_operations;
> + break;
> #ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP
> case PROC_TID_SECCOMP:
> case PROC_TGID_SECCOMP:
> -
This thread has gone stale. The PAGE_SIZE limit still exists. Is this
solution acceptable?
thanks,
--Guy Streeter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
The value of shmmax may be larger than will fit in the struct used by
the 32bit compat version of sys_shmctl. This change mirrors what the
normal sys_shmctl does when called with the old IPC_INFO command.
Signed-off-by: Guy Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
ipc/compat.c |4
1
As written, sys_shmget will return ENOSPC when one page is still
available for allocation. This patch corrects the test.
Signed-off-by: Guy Streeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Index: linux-2.6/ipc/shm.c
===
--- linux-2.6.or
5 matches
Mail list logo