reiserfs probs on 2.2.17

Resending it, as it doesn't seem it got through the previous times. - Forwarded message from Arnaud Installe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: reiserfs probs on 2.2.17 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:42:29 +0100 Hello, I've had a problem with a reiserf

Re: high load & poor interactivity on fast thread creation

threads as fast as Linux does. > > > > Is there a way (setting ?) to solve this problem ? Rate-limit the number > > of threads created ? The problem occurred on linux 2.2, IBM Java 1.1.8. -- Arnaud Installe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M

Re: high load & poor interactivity on fast thread creation

27;ll have to re-read it to freshen up my memory. Arnaud -- Arnaud Installe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Absence is to love what wind is to fire. It extinguishes the small, it enkindles the great. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u

high load & poor interactivity on fast thread creation

he problem occurred on linux 2.2, IBM Java 1.1.8. Thanks, Arnaud -- Arnaud Installe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Look, we trade every day out there with hustlers, deal-makers, shysters, con-men. That

Re: 3c59x problems solved -- mostly

ease, before doing anything else, see if > > echo '512 1024 1536' > /proc/sys/vm/freepages > > makes a difference? I've been using '512 1024 2048' for the last series of tests. I suppose that's ok as well, or isn't it ?

3c59x problems solved -- mostly

buffer overruns. Arnaud -- Arnaud Installe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I like to believe that people in the long run are going to do more to promote peace than our governments. Indeed, I think that people want peace so much that one of these

Re: 3c59x NIC overruns with multicast makes networking freeze

receiving multicast. So that means for nodes "hardware filters really help", so we really shouldn't be using 3c59x-drivers, right ? Am I correct that Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100 cards would be a better choice ? On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 03:23:45PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > Ar

3c59x NIC overruns with multicast makes networking freeze

machine. Restarting the network scripts solves the problem. Any suggestions ? Tnx, Arnaud -- Arnaud Installe [EMAIL PROTECTED] One cannot make an omelette without breaking eggs -- but it is

Re: files bigger than 2 GB

First of all, thanks to all of you for your responses. :-) I was under the impression 2.4 still didn't have large file support, as I seem to recall ssize_t still was 32 bits. On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >>>>> Arnaud Installe writes

files bigger than 2 GB

hanks, Arnaud -- Arnaud Installe [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in t