Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly

/0x90 Alexey Dobriyan 于2018年12月14日周五 下午11:44写道： > > On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 03:26:04PM +0800, 程洋 wrote: > > Anyone who can review my patch? > > > > 程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:34写道： > > > > > > Here is an article illustrates the details. > > > https:/

Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly

@Nick. Would mind giving this patch an "Acked-by"? This issue causes any Android who uses latest kernel cannot mount proc with "hidepid=2" option. Which causes problems 程洋 于2018年12月5日周三 下午3:26写道： > > Anyone who can review my patch? > > 程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:

Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly

Anyone who can review my patch? 程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:34写道： > > Here is an article illustrates the details. > https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-android-system-security-vulnerability-9b955a182f20 > > And There is a similar fix on kernel-4.4: > https://git.kernel

Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly

roc" in the runtime(by add some logs). And even it is called, it doesn't clean sb->s_root. Until now, i didn't see any deeper issue. Maybe it's true that we should handle proc filesystem specially. If anyone who is sure about the functionality of sb->s_root and think it shoul

Re: > [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly

his considered to be security sensitive? I can guess, but I'd like to know your reasoning. A: See the article above. It's part of Android sanbox. 程洋 于2018年11月30日周五 上午10:34写道： > > Here is an article illustrates the details. > https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-a

> [PATCH] Security: Handle hidepid option correctly

Here is an article illustrates the details. https://medium.com/@topjohnwu/from-anime-game-to-android-system-security-vulnerability-9b955a182f20 And There is a similar fix on kernel-4.4: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=99663be772c827b8f5f594fe87eb4807be