On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 04:10, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
>
> ALU sanitization was introduced to ensure that a subsequent ptr access
> can never go OOB, even under speculation. This is required because we
> currently allow speculative scalar confusion. Spec. scalar confusion is
> possible because Spectre
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 6:22 AM Sami Uddin wrote:
>
> From: Sami Uddin
>
> Prevent usage of shared memory regions where the length is zero,
> as such configurations are not valid and may lead to unexpected behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sami Uddin
> ---
> v3:
> - Use idiomatic 'if (!region->len)'
On 5/7/25 09:01, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add support for DisplayPort Jack events, so that user space can
> configure the audio routing correctly.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss
Reviewed-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
> ---
> sound/soc/qcom/sm8250.c | 17 ++--
On 5/7/25 09:01, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Sound machine drivers for Qualcomm SoCs can be reused across multiple
> SoCs. But user space ALSA UCM files depend on the card driver name which
> should be set per board/SoC.
>
> Allow such customization by using driver match data as sound card driver
> nam
This commit introduces a new vmtest.sh runner for vsock.
It uses virtme-ng/qemu to run tests in a VM. The tests validate G2H,
H2G, and loopback. The testing tools from tools/testing/vsock/ are
reused. Currently, only vsock_test is used.
VMCI and hyperv support is automatically built, though not u
On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 04:17, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
>
> Insert a nospec before the access to prevent it from ever using an index
> that is subject to speculative scalar-confusion.
>
> The access itself can either happen directly in the BPF program (reads
> only, check_stack_read_var_off()) or in a h
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 9:21 AM Jon Kohler wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 16, 2025, at 6:15 AM, Eugenio Perez Martin
> > wrote:
> >
> > !---|
> > CAUTION: External Email
> >
> > |
On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 04:03, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
>
> This is based on the gadget from the description of commit 9183671af6db
> ("bpf: Fix leakage under speculation on mispredicted branches").
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis Gerhorst
> ---
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:08:48PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 5/8/25 3:23 AM, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > This commit introduces a new vmtest.sh runner for vsock.
> >
> > It uses virtme-ng/qemu to run tests in a VM. The tests validate G2H,
> > H2G, and loopback. The testing tools from tools/test
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 08:11:40AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, May 13 2025 at 22:24, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> > From: Eric Biggers
> >
> > lib/crc32.c and include/linux/crc32.h got missed by the bulk SPDX
> > conversion because of the nonstandard explanation of the license.
> > However
On Tue, May 13 2025 at 22:24, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers
>
> lib/crc32.c and include/linux/crc32.h got missed by the bulk SPDX
> conversion because of the nonstandard explanation of the license.
> However, crc32.c clearly states that it's licensed under the GNU General
> Public Lice
On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 04:00, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
>
> This implements the core of the series and causes the verifier to fall
> back to mitigating Spectre v1 using speculation barriers. The approach
> was presented at LPC'24 [1] and RAID'24 [2].
>
> If we find any forbidden behavior on a speculativ
From: Eric Biggers
lib/crc32.c and include/linux/crc32.h got missed by the bulk SPDX
conversion because of the nonstandard explanation of the license.
However, crc32.c clearly states that it's licensed under the GNU General
Public License, Version 2. And the comment in crc32.h clearly indicates
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 08:38:57PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 08:44:49PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:37:11PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:34:59PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 13, 2025
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 08:44:49PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:37:11PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:34:59PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 02:24:46PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 3:09 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:08:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:27 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:34:49AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 6:56 PM M
I failed to build this test on Ubuntu 24.04. Compiler complains that
function sys_open_tree has already been defined in
"../filesystems/overlayfs/wrappers.h".
Signed-off-by: Chen Linxuan
---
tools/testing/selftests/mount_setattr/mount_setattr_test.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
dif
I failed to build this test on Ubuntu 24.04.
Compiler complained about undefined functions mount, umount and some
mount related flags.
Signed-off-by: Chen Linxuan
---
tools/testing/selftests/pid_namespace/pid_max.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/pid_n
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:37:11PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:34:59PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 02:24:46PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> > > > @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct kparam_array
> > > >
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:34:59PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 02:24:46PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > +++ b/include/linux/moduleparam.h
> > > @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ struct kparam_array
> > > * charp: a character pointer
> > > * bool: a bool, values 0/
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 02:24:46PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:07:32AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Static keys can now be a module parameter, e.g.
> >
> > module_param_named(foo, foo.key, static_key_t, 0644)
> >
> > bcachefs is now using this.
> >
> > Cc: Luis
The test file for the IR decoder used single-line comments at the top
to document its purpose and licensing, which is inconsistent with the style
used throughout the Linux kernel.
in this patch i converted the file header to a proper multi-line comment block
(/*) that aligns with standard kernel
On May 12, 2025 11:06:02 PM PDT, "Jürgen Groß" wrote:
>On 13.05.25 07:55, Xin Li wrote:
>> On 5/12/2025 4:24 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> Now with the mentioned patch really attached. :-)
>>>
>>
>> Does it allow patching with an instruction more than 6 bytes long?
>>
>> The immediate form MSR i
This patch improves the clarity and grammar of output messages in the acct()
selftest. Minor changes were made to user-facing strings and comments to make
them easier to understand and more consistent with the kselftest style.
Changes include:
- Fixing grammar in printed messages and comments.
- R
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Wed, 7 May 2025 10:14:56 -0500 you wrote:
> These tests:
> "SOCK_STREAM ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) 0 unsent bytes"
> "SOCK_SEQPACKET ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) 0 unsent bytes"
> output: "Unexpected 'SIOCOUTQ' value, expected 0, got
Improve the grammar in the test name by changing "get runtime memory use"
to "get runtime memory usage". Also adjust spacing in output lines
("Total:", "Free:", etc.) to ensure consistent alignment and readability.
Signed-off-by: Abdelrahman Fekry
---
tools/testing/selftests/size/get_size.c | 6
Improve the grammar in the test name by changing "get runtime memory use"
to "get runtime memory usage". Also adjust spacing in output lines
("Total:", "Free:", etc.) to ensure consistent alignment and readability.
Signed-off-by: Abdelrahman Fekry
---
tools/testing/selftests/size/get_size.c | 6
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 01:36:59PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra
>
> With the goal of deprecating / removing VOLUNTARY preempt, live-patch
> needs to stop relying on cond_resched() to make forward progress.
>
> Instead, rely on schedule() with TASK_FREEZABLE set.
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:07:32AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Static keys can now be a module parameter, e.g.
>
> module_param_named(foo, foo.key, static_key_t, 0644)
>
> bcachefs is now using this.
>
> Cc: Luis Chamberlain
> Cc: Petr Pavlu
> Cc: Sami Tolvanen
> Cc: Daniel Gomez
> Cc: l
Hi Peng,
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 03:43:37PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Hiago,
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 01:00:54PM -0300, Hiago De Franco wrote:
> >From: Hiago De Franco
> >
> >Move imx_sc_get_pd_power() from pmdomain/imx/scu-pd.c to
> >firmware/imx/misc.c and rename it to imx_sc_pm_get_resou
On Wed, 07 May 2025 10:01:36 +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add the necessary sound card bits and some dts additions to enable sound
> over DisplayPort-over-USB-C, e.g. to a connected TV or monitor.
>
> The UCM files can be found here:
> https://gitlab.postmarketos.org/postmarketOS/pmaports/-/tree/m
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 10:49:59PM +0800, laokz wrote:
> On 5/10/2025 4:17 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > +
> > +#define sym_for_each_reloc(elf, sym, reloc)
> > \
> > + for (reloc = find_reloc_by_dest_range(elf, sym->sec,\
> > +
On Mon, 12 May 2025 02:40:15 +0300, Matti Lehtimäki wrote:
> Recent change to handle platforms with only single power domain broke
> pronto-v3 which requires power domains and doesn't have fallback voltage
> regulators in case power domains are missing. Add a check to verify
> the number of fallb
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 19:09:29 +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> When the mailbox driver has not probed yet, the error message "failed to
> parse smd edge" is just going to confuse users, so improve the error
> prints a bit.
>
> Cover the last remaining exits from qcom_smd_parse_edge with proper
> error
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 09:52:44 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Commit 4b4ab93ddc5f ("dt-bindings: remoteproc: Consolidate SC8180X and
> SM8150 PAS files") moved SC8180X bindings from separate file into this
> one, but it forgot to add actual compatibles in top-level properties
> section making
On Sat, 03 May 2025 00:37:58 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> SC8280XP features a SLPI, much like its distant relative, SM8350.
>
> This series adds the bindings and dt node for it (also cleaning up the
> DTSI in meantime)
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sm8350-pas: Add
On Wed, 02 Apr 2025 13:59:51 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The device_del() call matches with the device_add() but we also need
> to call put_device() to trigger the qcom_iris_release().
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] remoteproc: qcom_wcnss_iris: Add missing put_device() on error in probe
c
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 10:26:12PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Right now it is clear that Greg objects but I personally think
> his counter-argument is weak.
>
> He is basically saying that LOC count is too much so Linux should stick
> to how things were always have been even if "old style" i
On Fri, 9 May 2025 23:34:26 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan
> ---
> Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 40 +-
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> b/Documentati
On Fri, 9 May 2025 23:34:27 +0300
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Linux's BUG_ON is done backwards (condition is inverted).
> But it is a long story.
>
> However C11/C23 allow to partially transition to what all normal
> programmers are used to, namely assert().
>
> Deprecate BUILD_BUG_ON, recommend
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 08:04:29PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:33:34PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:12:49AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 07:08:53PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > >
> > > > I split them like referendum
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:56:56PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 09:43:10AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> > On 5/9/2025 11:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:34:30PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > >> Require set of curlies {} in all if/else branches and all l
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:33:34PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:12:49AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 07:08:53PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> >
> > > I split them like referendum ballots to see where the consensus at and
> > > not have big singl
On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 09:37:02PM -0500, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Fan Ni wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2025 at 05:52:08PM -0500, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > > A git tree of this series can be found here:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/weiny2/linux-kernel/tree/dcd-v6-2025-04-13
> > >
> > > This is now based on
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 08:21:01AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:34:27PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Linux's BUG_ON is done backwards (condition is inverted).
> > But it is a long story.
> >
> > However C11/C23 allow to partially transition to what all normal
> > program
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 12:47:19PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 9 May 2025 23:34:25 +0300
> Alexey Dobriyan escreveu:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan
> > ---
> > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 14 ++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 08:18:53AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:34:25PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan
> > ---
> > Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 14 ++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> We can't take patches wi
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 05:12:49AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 07:08:53PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> > I split them like referendum ballots to see where the consensus at and
> > not have big single discussion thread.
>
> Just in case - consensus would look like a lot of
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 06:57:49PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 07:08:53PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 04:05:29AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > Alexey Dobriyan writes:
> > >
> > > > Every time I open Documentation/CodingStyle it says the part
Le 10/05/2025 à 23:01, Kent Overstreet a écrit :
Static keys can now be a module parameter, e.g.
module_param_named(foo, foo.key, static_key_t, 0644)
bcachefs is now using this.
Cc: Luis Chamberlain
Cc: Petr Pavlu
Cc: Sami Tolvanen
Cc: Daniel Gomez
Cc: linux-modu...@vger.kernel.org
Sign
Yan Zhao writes:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 12:22:47PM -0700, Ackerley Tng wrote:
>> Yan Zhao writes:
>>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > What options does userspace have in this scenario?
>> >> > It can't reduce the flag to KVM_GUEST_MEMFD_HUGE_2MB. Adjusting the
>> >> > gmem.pgoff
>> >> > isn't ideal
On 4/29/25 03:08, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:27:21AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Specifying a non-zero value for a new struct kmem_cache_args field
>> sheaf_capacity will setup a caching layer of percpu arrays called
>> sheaves of given capacity for the created cache.
>>
>>
Hello,
It is the last week to submit your proposal!
The Automated Testing Summit (ATS) 2025 will be held as a co-located event at
the Open Source Summit North America!
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/open-source-summit-north-america/features/co-located-events/#automated-testing-summit-2025
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Wen Yang
--
Best wishes,
Wen
On 2025/5/13 15:44, Ryan Chung wrote:
- Rename test from to
- Make the RDWR‐flag comment declarative:
“The kernel automatically adds the O_RDWR flag.”
- Update semaphore‐flag failure message to:
“eventfd semaphore flag check failed:
:
mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
return ret;
---
base-commit: aa94665adc28f3fdc3de2979ac1e98bae961d6ca
change-id: 20250513-revert-rproc-table-sz-53ecf24726ae
Best regards,
--
Bjorn Andersson
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 03:34:50PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the updated version.
>
> On Fri, 9 May 2025, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
> > From: Peter Zijlstra
> >
> > With the goal of deprecating / removing VOLUNTARY preempt, live-patch
> > needs to stop relying
On 5/10/2025 4:17 AM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
+
+#define sym_for_each_reloc(elf, sym, reloc)\
+ for (reloc = find_reloc_by_dest_range(elf, sym->sec, \
+ sym->offset, sym->len); \
+reloc && reloc_of
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 03:51:00PM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> On 5/10/25 23:01, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > Static keys can now be a module parameter, e.g.
> >
> > module_param_named(foo, foo.key, static_key_t, 0644)
> >
> > bcachefs is now using this.
> >
> > Cc: Luis Chamberlain
> > Cc: Petr P
On Tue, 13 May 2025, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 03:34:50PM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > thanks for the updated version.
> >
> > On Fri, 9 May 2025, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> >
> > > From: Peter Zijlstra
> > >
> > > With the goal of deprecating / r
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:41:17PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On 5/8/25 4:20 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 7de870dee1cf..533d9463a297 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsoc
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:37:36PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On 5/8/25 4:20 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
From: Stefano Garzarella
When the other peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RD), there is a chance that
the send() call could occur before the message carrying the close
information arrives over the
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 10:46:35AM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
On 5/7/25 5:14 PM, Konstantin Shkolnyy wrote:
These tests:
"SOCK_STREAM ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) 0 unsent bytes"
"SOCK_SEQPACKET ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) 0 unsent bytes"
output: "Unexpected 'SIOCOUTQ' value, expected 0, got 64 (CLIENT)".
They t
Hi,
thanks for the updated version.
On Fri, 9 May 2025, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra
>
> With the goal of deprecating / removing VOLUNTARY preempt, live-patch
> needs to stop relying on cond_resched() to make forward progress.
>
> Instead, rely on schedule() with TA
Static keys can now be a module parameter, e.g.
module_param_named(foo, foo.key, static_key_t, 0644)
bcachefs is now using this.
Cc: Luis Chamberlain
Cc: Petr Pavlu
Cc: Sami Tolvanen
Cc: Daniel Gomez
Cc: linux-modu...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf
Cc: Jason Baron
C
Hello wpan maintainers/developers,
This is a 31-day syzbot report for the wpan subsystem.
All related reports/information can be found at:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream/s/wpan
During the period, 0 new issues were detected and 0 were fixed.
In total, 5 issues are still open and 26 have al
On Sat May 10, 2025 at 4:03 PM UTC, Ujwal Kundur wrote:
> Refactor macros and non-composite global variable definitions into a
> struct that is defined at the start of a test and is passed around
> instead of relying on global vars.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ujwal Kundur
Tested-by: Brendan Jackman https
From: Lukas Bulwahn
Commit cbbd847d107f ("tools/x86/kcpuid: Introduce a complete cpuid
bitfields CSV file") turns the tools/arch/x86/kcpuid/cpuid.csv to be an
auto-generated file from an input file maintained at x86-cpuid.org project.
The x86-cpuid.org project clearly states that the auto-generat
Hi Clément,
On 12/05/2025 10:46, Clément Léger wrote:
This selftest tests all the currently emulated instruction (except for
the RV32 compressed ones which are left as a future exercise for a RV32
user). For the FPU instructions, all the FPU registers are tested.
This commit can be tested using
On 5/8/25 4:20 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> From: Stefano Garzarella
>
> When the other peer calls shutdown(SHUT_RD), there is a chance that
> the send() call could occur before the message carrying the close
> information arrives over the transport. In such cases, the send()
> might still suc
On 5/8/25 4:20 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> index 7de870dee1cf..533d9463a297 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
> @@ -1074,9 +1074,13 @@ static void test_st
On 5/8/25 3:23 AM, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> This commit introduces a new vmtest.sh runner for vsock.
>
> It uses virtme-ng/qemu to run tests in a VM. The tests validate G2H,
> H2G, and loopback. The testing tools from tools/testing/vsock/ are
> reused. Currently, only vsock_test is used.
>
> VMCI
When running `make kselftest`, the following compilation warning was
encountered:
mount-notify_test.c: In function ‘fanotify_rmdir’:
mount-notify_test.c:490:17: warning: ignoring return value of ‘chdir’ declared
with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Wunused-result]
490 | chdir(
On 5/7/25 5:14 PM, Konstantin Shkolnyy wrote:
> These tests:
> "SOCK_STREAM ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) 0 unsent bytes"
> "SOCK_SEQPACKET ioctl(SIOCOUTQ) 0 unsent bytes"
> output: "Unexpected 'SIOCOUTQ' value, expected 0, got 64 (CLIENT)".
>
> They test that the SIOCOUTQ ioctl reports 0 unsent bytes a
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 10:10:28AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 02:54:11PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > Move both sysrq ctl_table and supported sysrq_sysctl_handler helper
> > function into drivers/tty/sysrq.c. Replaced the __do_proc_dointvec in
> > helper function with do_p
- Rename test from to
- Make the RDWR‐flag comment declarative:
“The kernel automatically adds the O_RDWR flag.”
- Update semaphore‐flag failure message to:
“eventfd semaphore flag check failed: …”
Signed-off-by: Ryan Chung
---
tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/eventfd/eventfd_test.c | 7
On 5/12/2025 4:20 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
On 09.05.25 10:18, Xin Li wrote:
On 5/6/2025 2:20 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
I'm trying to evaluate how to add the immediate form MSR instructions
on top of this patch set. And I'm close to get it done.
There is something to consider when running as a Xe
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 09:09:44AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 02:54:05PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/module/kmod.c b/kernel/module/kmod.c
> > index
> > 25f25381251281a390b273cd8a734c92b960113a..5701629adc27b4bb5080db75f0e69f9f55e9d2ad
> > 1006
On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 12:01:24PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 02:54:13PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > Move cad_pid as well as supporting function proc_do_cad_pid into
> > kernel/pic.c. Replaced call to __do_proc_dointvec with proc_dointvec
> > inside proc_do_cad_pid which
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 12:08:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:27 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 11:34:49AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 6:56 PM Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 a
79 matches
Mail list logo
