Ville Nummela wrote:
> In kernel/softirq.c, line 178:
>
> if (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
> tasklet_schedule(t);
>
> What's the idea behind this line? If the tasklet is already scheduled,
> schedule it again? This does not make much sense to
Hi,
I have little question about tasklets in the kernel 2.4.6:
In kernel/softirq.c, line 178:
if (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
tasklet_schedule(t);
What's the idea behind this line? If the tasklet is already scheduled,
schedule it again? Thi
> >
> > FYI, I see a similar problem under 2.4.5, also SMP, although only
> > intermittently. Two oopses are below, from two different, although
> > similarly configured, machines.
>
> [snip]
>
> Sounds very similar. Our servers are all identical (except for RAM).
>
> What's unusual is that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In Linux PPC, the MSR[FP] bit (that is floating point available bit) is off
> (atleast for non-SMP).
>
> Due to this, whenever some floating point instruction is executed in 'user
> mode', it leads to a exception 'FPUnavailable'. The exception handler for
Yes, this i
Jeff writes:
> I've always thought it would be neat to do:
>
> cat bzImage initrd.tar.gz > vmlinuz
> rdev --i-have-a-tarball-piggyback vmlinuz
>
> Linking into the image is easy for hackers, but why not make it
> scriptable and super-easy for end users? x86 already has the rdev
> ut
Trevor Hemsley wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 03:06:11, Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, Cardbus and USB problems... you probably have both Cardbus and
> > i82365 support in your kernel configuration.
>
> Once I have the BIOS set to "cardbus/16 bit" instead of "auto-detect"
> I
Derek Vadala writes:
> It's clear that under 2.4, the kernel imposes a limit of 2TB as the
> maximum file size and that some portion of the kernels before 2.4 had a
> limit of 2GB.
>
> However, it's not clear to me when the file size limit was increased, or
> what the maximum file system sizes un
Bob_Tracy wrote:
>
> Andrea Arcangeli quoted:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > > > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > > > recompiled and it
I've been trying to do some research on the file size and filesystem size
limitations under Linux for stable releases since 2.0.
It's clear that under 2.4, the kernel imposes a limit of 2TB as the
maximum file size and that some portion of the kernels before 2.4 had a
limit of 2GB.
However, it'
Hi again,
I have been able to reproduce the locking-up behaviour! It occurs every
time I start Mozilla (0.9.2) or gtkEmbed. Other memory intensive programs
(GIMP) don't have that behaviour.
Strangely enough, the system remains mostly functional: I can switch
consoles, X and Enlightenment remain
Hi,
I want to know the difference between the
cleanup_module and delete_module system call. Can any
one please clarify my doubt.
Thanks,
sendhil
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
Hello,
I am running linux kernal 2.4.2 .
My query is concerning the manner in which the TCP code
handles the initial window size value ( RWIN ) in the TCP header.
I observed that RWIN that the client
announces is 5840 bytes in the packet irrespective of what value
I set using the setsockopt .
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, David Whysong wrote:
> Jes Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> >You ran out of memory, ie. there were no more free blocks of 16
> >consecutive pages available in the system. This is what happens on a
> >system with little memory or which is loaded with memory intensive
In kernel 2.4.4, a change was made to gamecon.c that causes problems
with Super Nintendo controllers. The directional pad no longer works
correctly - only the up and left directions work. The following patch
fixes the problem by reversing the change. It applies cleanly to
kernels 2.4.4, 2.4.5, and
Rob Landley writes:
> Off the top of my head, fun things you can't do suid root:
...
> ps (What the...? Worked in Red Hat 7, but not in suse 7.1.
> Huh? "suid-to apache ps ax" works fine, though...)
The ps command used to require setuid root. People would set the
bit by habit.
> I keep bump
Hello to all.
I have the following setup.
tyan s1590s motherboard, 64mb ram, two ide ports on board, amdk63d
processor.
I am running debian linux using kernel 2.2.19.
I have a Ricoh MP7120 cdrw drive. This is an atapi drive. Because of
this I need to use the ide-scsi driver along with the s
Jes Sorensen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>You ran out of memory, ie. there were no more free blocks of 16
>consecutive pages available in the system. This is what happens on a
>system with little memory or which is loaded with memory intensive
>applications.
I'm seeing the same thing here on a ma
Hello,
I don't know whether this is the right place to send this question,
but do you have any software for Linux which allows me to mount
HFS Plus file systems on a Linux 2.4.x kernel?
I am particularly interested in mounting file systems which have
been created under Mac OS 9.1 or Mac OS X.
T
> > > Is there a reason that it does this?
> >
> > I believe there is. It wants to find what drive is bios drive 80h.
>
> Yes.
>
> > I had a machine at work with both ide and scsi. ide hdd was hdc and ide
> > cdrom was hda just to keep lilo from thinking hdc is the first bios drive
> > which
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 01:08:55AM +0200, Guest section DW wrote:
> (But you must distinguish people. One complains about the probing,
> another about the numbering. The bios keyword tells lilo about
> the numbering, and it works.)
Well, shouldn't lilo avoid probing if you pass bios=? Currently i
On 20010706 Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
>On 05-Jul-2001 David Woodhouse wrote:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>> This program prints garbage:
>>> #define min(x,y) ({ typeof((x)) _x = (x); typeof((y)) _y = (y);
>>> #(_x>_y)?_y:_x; })
>>> int main (void) {
>>> int
Hi Andrew!
On Fri, 06 Jul 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Okay, here's the output of gdb:
> >
> > (gdb) x/10i 0xc0118028
> > 0xc0118028 : mov0x4(%esp,1),%eax
> > 0xc011802c : cmpl $0x0,0xc025c2e4
> > 0xc0118033 : jne0xc0118043
> > 0xc0118035 : mov0xc024af20(,%eax,4
Thanks for the report on the locking issue. A fix is checked in locally.
> From: Petr Vandrovec [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Replying to myself, after following change in additon to acpi_ex_...
> poweroff on my machine works. It should probably map type 0
> => 0, 3 => 1
> and 7 => 2, but it is h
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 04:03:32PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 01:01:07AM +0200, Guest section DW wrote:
> > But why don't you use the bios keyword? From lilo.conf(5):
>
> It doesn't help.
Of course it does.
(But you must distinguish people. One complains about the pro
Good Morning!
NOTE: Please CC answers/replies to my personal email account, because i can't keep
track of all the stuff on linux-kernel, as i just started a new job. Thank you very
much!
Ok i'll try to stick to the bug report form :)
PROBLEM: Kernel Panics since i switched to T-DSL, using mas
Hi there,
Sorry to bother you with this, but I have some new ideas to keep the
MAINTAINERS-file up-to-date. Currently, data in the file aren't up-to-date.
I had the following idea:
What if we create a website, where maintainers can verify and update their
records. Records could also be added, in
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 01:01:07AM +0200, Guest section DW wrote:
> But why don't you use the bios keyword? From lilo.conf(5):
It doesn't help.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vg
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 06:03:31PM -0400, Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > Before doing anything LILO v21 collects the hda, hdb, sda, sdb info.
> > > There is no problem, certainly no kernel problem.
> >
> > Sure it isn't a problem, but it's really annoying if it won't need to
> > touch hda anyway.
> >
Linus,
I just downloaded the 2.4.6 kernel and got a compile error while
building the mtd driver as a module. The following patch addresses the
issue and I apologize if someone has already sent this in.
-Jeff
--- 2.4.6.clean/include/linux/mtd/cfi.h Thu Jul 5 15:03:47 2001
+++ 2.4.6/include/l
Andrea Arcangeli quoted:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > > recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> > > Too
Wakko Warner writes:
> I believe there is. It wants to find what drive is bios drive 80h. Really
> annoying since there's no way (correct me if I'm wrong) to read bios from
> linux. If there is, lilo should do that. But since it's an old copy, this
> probably was fixed.
>
> I had a machine at
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 03:06:11, Erik Mouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hmm, Cardbus and USB problems... you probably have both Cardbus and
> i82365 support in your kernel configuration.
Once I have the BIOS set to "cardbus/16 bit" instead of "auto-detect"
I don't have a problem with having both
> > cache_add("/dev/hda",0x300);
> > for (i = 1; i <= 8; i++) {
> > sprintf(tmp,"/dev/hda%d",i);
> > cache_add(tmp,0x300+i);
> >
> > Before doing anything LILO v21 collects the hda, hdb, sda, sdb info.
> > There is no problem, certainly no kernel problem.
>
> Sure it isn'
> "Ho" == Ho Chak Hung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ho> Hi, I got the error __alloc_pages: 4-order allocation failed in a
Ho> module that uses and frees a lot of pages. Basically, I am trying
Ho> implement a page cache for the module. First, I keep allocating
Ho> pages using page_cache_alloc(
I was wondering how I can increase the process address space, TASK_SIZE
(PAGE_OFFSET), in the current kernel. It looks like the 3 GB value is
hardcoded in a couple of places and is thus not trivial to alter. Is
there any good reason to limit this value at all, why not just have it
be the same as t
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:32:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have a problem with the driver for Initio SCSI Controller 9100 SCSI,
> > a dual channel UW SCSI-Controller. On checking the SCSI bus the systems
> > has problems to initialize the CD-RW Sanyo (aka Brainwave) BP4-N SCSI
> > The CD-RW has
> cache_add("/dev/hda",0x300);
> for (i = 1; i <= 8; i++) {
> sprintf(tmp,"/dev/hda%d",i);
> cache_add(tmp,0x300+i);
>
> Before doing anything LILO v21 collects the hda, hdb, sda, sdb info.
> There is no problem, certainly no kernel problem.
Sure it isn't a problem, but i
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:58:18PM -0500, Stephen C Burns wrote:
> modprobe: Can't locate module block-major-3
If you want to get rid of this, add:
alias block-major-3 off
in /etc/modules.conf
--
Russell King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])The developer of ARM Linux
http://www
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> ... It also fixes a vm deadlock ...
I take it you've submitted this part of the patch set
to Linus and Alan so we'll see it in the main kernel
soon ? ;)
regards,
Rik
--
Executive summary of a recent Microsoft press release:
"we are concerned
On 4 Jul 2001, Ronald Bultje wrote:
> Hi,
Hi back at you :-)
> you might remember an e-mail from me (two weeks ago) with my problems
> where linux would not boot up or be highly instable on a machine with
> 256 MB RAM, while it was 100% stable with 128 MB RAM. Basically, I still
> have this pro
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:58:18PM -0500, Stephen C Burns wrote:
> Each time I run lilo, I receive the following message in syslog:
>
> modprobe: Can't locate module block-major-3
>
> This machine has no IDE devices. when I run lilo in verbose mode, I see
> that it is querying all possible har
On Monday 02 July 2001 15:10, Hua Zhong wrote:
> -> From Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> > > (a) It does less, namely will not kill processes with uid 0.
> > > Ted, any objections?
> >
> > That breaks the security guarantee. Suppose I use a setuid app to confuse
> > you into doing something ?
>
>
> > can someone please recommend a motherboard that can carry four CPUs,
> > either AMD or Intel (but other than Pentium III Xeon 700
> > Mhz) capable of> > running Linux?
>
> If you're going to go quad then you're usually better off
> dealing with a big
> company like Dell or IBM than going ho
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 02:58:18PM -0500, Stephen C Burns wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Each time I run lilo, I receive the following message in syslog:
>
> modprobe: Can't locate module block-major-3
I have the same problem. http://bugs.debian.org/83710
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "
Booting up the system normally today, my first try with 2.4.6-ac1 yielded the
following OOPS:
ksymoops 2.4.0 on i686 2.4.6-ac1. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.6-ac1/ (default)
-m /boot/System.map-2.4.6-a
Hey all,
Each time I run lilo, I receive the following message in syslog:
modprobe: Can't locate module block-major-3
This machine has no IDE devices. when I run lilo in verbose mode, I see
that it is querying all possible hard disks in /dev (e.g. Caching device
/dev/hda (0x0300, etc.). I am,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 01:24:03PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can someone please recommend a motherboard that can carry four CPUs,
> either AMD or Intel (but other than Pentium III Xeon 700 Mhz) capable
> of running Linux?
I only know of , but they use Xeon last time I
checked.
pIII's other than xeons aren't capable of running in > 2 cpu
configurations...
you chipset choices are also limited to 450nx, profusion, and serverset
IIIHE
joelja
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can someone please recommend a motherboard that can carry four CPUs,
>
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can someone please recommend a motherboard that can carry four CPUs,
> either AMD or Intel (but other than Pentium III Xeon 700 Mhz) capable of
> running Linux?
>
> Best regards,
> Ognen
If you're going to go quad then you're usually bette
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> can someone please recommend a motherboard that can carry four CPUs,
> either AMD or Intel (but other than Pentium III Xeon 700 Mhz) capable of
> running Linux?
So you want a quad-pentiumpro-200 do you? :D
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hello,
can someone please recommend a motherboard that can carry four CPUs,
either AMD or Intel (but other than Pentium III Xeon 700 Mhz) capable of
running Linux?
Best regards,
Ognen
--
Ognen Duzlevski
Plant Biotechnology Institute
National Research Council of Canada
Bioinformatics team
-
To
Hi,
I patched semaphore.c to compile cleanly and without any warning when
using GCC 3.0.
Regards,
Erik
/*
* i386 semaphore implementation.
*
* (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds
*
* Portions Copyright 1999 Red Hat, Inc.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it an
In linux-kernel, you wrote:
> Peter Zaitsev wrote:
> >
> > That's why I thought this problem is related to raid1 swapping I'm
> > using.
>
> Well there is the potential problem that RAID1 has that it can't avoid allocating
> memory in some occasions, for the 2nd bufferhead. ATARAID raid0 has the
Jordan Breeding wrote:
>
> I have a Tyan Tiger 230 SMP system running dual 1 GHz PIII processors.
> The processors are of the same lot and revision, bought on the same
> day. Everything worked fine or some time in regard to
> halting/rebooting. I was using ac kernels configured with ACPI. At t
Justin Guyett wrote:
>
> After upgrading to xfree 4.1.0, after switching back to the console after
> starting X, suspending, and resuming, the text-mode terminals are corrupt
2.4.x and XFree86 4.1.0 is first combination that doesn't mess up my text
console and crash if there are graphics updates
The main new thing is the blkdev in pagecache by default (not in the
experimental dir anymore). Ramdisk and initrd should work fine now
(initrd is untested though). It also fixes a vm deadlock and merges uml
from -ac.
Diff between 2
> > A. Check bit 0 of the status port and return
> >
> > B. Check bit 4 or bit 9 of the interrupt control register
> >
> > Without docs someone would need to play with the various combinations and
> > see what happened
>
> Uhmmm, an idea would be to look in fd_mcs.c as that driver already ha
Only rediffed (maintenance mode, no known bugs, alpha rtc thing not
merged yet).
---
Difference between 2.2.20pre5aa1 and 2.2.20pre7aa1:
Only in 2.2.20pre5aa1: 00_K7_P4-cachelines-4
Only in 2.2.20pre7aa1: 00_K7_P4-cachelines-5
Fixup trivia
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 07:16:26PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I have recently had a problem with the fdomain driver initialisation and
> > have found the problem to be the way in which it requests the irq. Here is
> > my patch that has so far work ok.
>
> I've seen this patch before. It needs at
> I have recently had a problem with the fdomain driver initialisation and
> have found the problem to be the way in which it requests the irq. Here is
> my patch that has so far work ok.
I've seen this patch before. It needs at least one change
> - do_fdomain_16x0_intr,
I have a Tyan Tiger 230 SMP system running dual 1 GHz PIII processors.
The processors are of the same lot and revision, bought on the same
day. Everything worked fine or some time in regard to
halting/rebooting. I was using ac kernels configured with ACPI. At the
time of the merge with the Lin
I have recently had a problem with the fdomain driver initialisation and
have found the problem to be the way in which it requests the irq. Here is
my patch that has so far work ok.
--- linux/drivers/scsi/fdomain.cThu Jul 5 13:35:41 2001
+++ fdomain.c Thu Jun 28 08:08:03 2001
@@ -981,8
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In Linux PPC, the MSR[FP] bit (that is floating point available bit) is off
> (atleast for non-SMP).
>
Yes, so the first FP instruction per process lets "lazy FPU" save/restore
work.
> Due to this, whenever some floating point instruction is execu
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote:
>
> > We've noticed the following kernel error since 2.4 (2.4.1-2.4.6).
> > It appears to be swap (kswapd thread specific?) related. The same
> > error is reported on several SMP machines after only a short per
Hmm,
I have no problems either.
Asus KT7 KT133 Chipset
root@station2-lnx:~# uname -a
Linux station2-lnx 2.4.6 #10 Thu Jul 5 11:08:39 CDT 2001 i686 unknown
root@station2-lnx:~# free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:512944 509888 3056
In Linux PPC, the MSR[FP] bit (that is floating point available bit) is off
(atleast for non-SMP).
Due to this, whenever some floating point instruction is executed in 'user
mode', it leads to a exception 'FPUnavailable'. The exception handler for
this exception apart from setting the MSR[FP] bit
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> getblk called from the fs calls grow_buffers with GFP_NOFS which doesn't
> inhibit shrink_dcache_memory to re-enter the fs in prune_dcache because
> __GFP_IO is set. And it will deadlock as usual when shrink_dcache reenter
> the fs that way.
Good c
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Christophe Beaumont wrote:
>
>
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Vasu Varma P V wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there any limitation on DMA memory we can allocate using
> > > kmalloc(size, GFP_DMA)? I am not able to acquire more than
> > > 14MB of the mem using this on my PCI SM
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Vasu Varma P V wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there any limitation on DMA memory we can allocate using
> > kmalloc(size, GFP_DMA)? I am not able to acquire more than
> > 14MB of the mem using this on my PCI SMP box with 256MB ram.
> > I think there is restriction on ISA boar
While I was travelling disconnected from the internet the last week (I
will buy a GPRS phone soon ;) I also spotted and fixed the __GFP_BUFFER
deadlock that I was triggering on my 128m laptop while browsing large
email folders on top of crypto loop:
--- 2.4.6pre6aa1/include/linux/mm.h.~1~ Sat Jun
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 09:54:05PM -0400, Rick Hohensee wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 11:37:28PM -0400, Rick Hohensee wrote:
> > > That's with the GNU tools, without asm(), and without proper declaration
> > > of printf, as is my tendency. I don't actually return an int either, do I?
> >
In mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote:
> We've noticed the following kernel error since 2.4 (2.4.1-2.4.6).
> It appears to be swap (kswapd thread specific?) related. The same
> error is reported on several SMP machines after only a short period
> (an hour or less).
FYI, I see a similar probl
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> > Too bad, this was the perfect excuse fo
I have successfully (finally) installed MPPE and PPP with PPP 2.40 and Linux
Kernel 2.4.2. However, anytime I allow and use MPPE-40 packets will not
forward into a VPN. If I comment it out and use MPPE-STATELESS or MPPE-128
it works fine. As soon as MPPE-40 is uncommented, it fails to operate.
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > My money is on the unconditional sti()'s in the cyrix code.
>
> Possibly but the diff is wrong
But it'll still work :)
--- linux-2.4.6/init/main.c Wed Jul 4 18:21:32 2001
+++ lk-ext3/init/main.c Fri Jul 6 02:06:12 2001
@@ -523,8 +523,8 @@ asmlinkage void __init star
Naveen Kumar Pagidimarri wrote:
> tell me the source where i can get the information about the
>
>
> data structures/related system calls used for the
>
> implementation of the ps command.
The ps command probably reads ALL or most of the info it needs from the /proc
directory. T
> My money is on the unconditional sti()'s in the cyrix code.
Possibly but the diff is wrong
> - cli();
> + save_flags(flags);
>>> cli() needed still
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
> Can someone please
> point out to me
> that he's actually running kernel-2.4.x on a machine with
> more than 128
> MB RAM and that he's NOT having severe stability problems?
> And can that same person PLEASE point out to me why 2.4.x is
> crashing on
> me (or help me to find out...)?
%uname -a
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> > And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> > recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> > Too bad, this was the perfect excuse for getting rid of those good old Cyrix
>
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:32:00PM +0800, Thibaut Laurent wrote:
> And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
> recompiled and it seems to work fine.
> Too bad, this was the perfect excuse for getting rid of those good old Cyrix
> boxen ;)
As Andrea's patches don'
And the winner is... Andrea. Kudos to you, I've just applied these patches,
recompiled and it seems to work fine.
Too bad, this was the perfect excuse for getting rid of those good old Cyrix
boxen ;)
Thanks,
Thibaut
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
th
> "Ragnar" == Ragnar Hojland Espinosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ragnar> And here's a counter claim: At home have 128 + 64, both of
Ragnar> different speeds and brands. Of course, to run properly you
Ragnar> have to force the pc100 to run at 66, but other than that
Ragnar> they're happy
> I want this. I've been thinking about it since your original post, and
I also would be very much interested in having such a great
tool by hand.
Please mail me any information, or code to try, thanx!
>
> Perhaps you should also think about a non-devfs way of doing this, I don't
> know, it's a
Ronald Bultje wrote:
> No, it's the installation so I'm booting from the CD (mdk-8/RH-7.1
> installation CDs).
Your cd might be corrupted. If you are using the same cd for both machines, try
changing it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Andrea Arcangeli schrieb am Donnerstag, den 05. Juli 2001:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 11:28:17PM +0200, Manfred H. Winter wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I tried to install kernel 2.4.6 with same configuration as 2.4.5, but
> > booting failed with:
> >
> > kernel BUG at softirq.c:206!
>
> do you have an
"Manfred H. Winter" wrote:
>
> ...
> > --- linux-2.4.6/kernel/softirq.c Wed Jul 4 18:21:32 2001
> > +++ lk-ext3/kernel/softirq.c Thu Jul 5 21:32:08 2001
> > @@ -202,8 +202,10 @@ static void tasklet_hi_action(struct sof
> > if (!tasklet_trylock(t))
> > B
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 08:23:10PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >huge copies. But what part of the normal handling of sequential files
> >would O_SEQUENTIAL change? Good handling of sequential files should
> >be the default, not an explicitly-requested feature.
>
> exactly what
On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> I am fine with "You have to use initrd (or similiar) _if_ you want this
> feature."
Nope.
I do not want to maintain two interfaces. If we make user space the way to
do these things, then we will do pretty much most of the driver setup etc
in user spa
> Well, on a laptop memory and disk bandwith are rarely wasted - they cost
> battery life.
I've been playing around with different scenarios to see the differences
in performance. A good way to trigger the cache problem is to untar a
couple of kernel source trees or other large amounts of files
Hi Alan!
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > This bug hits me since 2.4.6-pre5 but nobody answered to my emails... The
> > code line is identical (and the softirq.c:206 ofc).
> >
> > Anyone, any idea?
>
> None at all. There are odd items in your config - like khttpd which if
> involved m
Nick DeClario wrote:
>
> Just out of curiousity what are the advantages to having a RAID1 swap
> partition? Setting the swap priority to 0 (pri=0) in the fstab of all
> the swap partitions on your system should have the same effect as doing
> it with RAID but without the overhead, right? RAID1
Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, notice that the scenario we were originally discussing, the off-hours
> updatedb, doesn't normally happen on laptops because they tend to be
> suspended at that time.
No, even worse, it happens when you open the laptop for the first time
in t
Hi Andrew!
On Thu, 05 Jul 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > kernel panic every time (see original post). My CPU is a MediaGX, and
> > Manfred's one is a 6x86MX. What about yours ?
> > After my first unsuccessful attempt with a 2.4.6-pre3, I tried several other
> > 2.4.6-preX and 2.4.5-acX kernels.
On Thursday 05 July 2001 17:00, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On 05 Jul 2001 17:04:00 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Also, notice that the scenario we were originally discussing, the
> > off-hours updatedb, doesn't normally happen on laptops because they tend
> > to be suspended at that time.
>
> Susp
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:28:15AM +1000, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > ext3 journals data. That's unique and it breaks things (or rather,
> > things break it). It'd be trivial to support O_DIRECT in ext3's
> > writeback mode (metadata-only), but nobody uses that.
>
> I
On 05 Jul 2001 17:04:00 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Well, on a laptop memory and disk bandwith are rarely wasted - they cost
> > battery life.
>
> Let me comment on this again, having spent a couple of minutes more
> thinking about it. Would you be happy paying 1% of your battery life to
On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:00, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On 05 Jul 2001 15:02:51 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Here's an idea I just came up with while I was composing this... along
> > the lines of using unused bandwidth for something that at least has a
> > chance of being useful. Suppose we
Just out of curiousity what are the advantages to having a RAID1 swap
partition? Setting the swap priority to 0 (pri=0) in the fstab of all
the swap partitions on your system should have the same effect as doing
it with RAID but without the overhead, right? RAID1 would also mirror
your swap. Wh
On Thursday 05 July 2001 16:00, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On 05 Jul 2001 15:02:51 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Here's an idea I just came up with while I was composing this... along
> > the lines of using unused bandwidth for something that at least has a
> > chance of being useful. Suppose we
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 12:28:15AM +1000, Andrew Morton wrote:
> ext3 journals data. That's unique and it breaks things (or rather,
> things break it). It'd be trivial to support O_DIRECT in ext3's
> writeback mode (metadata-only), but nobody uses that.
I thought everybody uses metadata-only t
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
