Gerhard Mack wrote:
>
> Ugh why VIA? They have been a constant source of trouble for me on both
> linux and windows. I have my doubts about their ability to get a chipset
> right in the first place.
>
> Some other possible Athlon boards:
> Asus A7M266 (AMD chipset)
> Asus A7A266 (ALI chipse
Jeff Garzik writes:
> Pavel Roskin wrote:
>> You may need to save some data in memory when the system goes
>> to suspend and restore them afterwards. I believe that the PCI
>> config space should be saved by BIOS. Everything else is the
>> responsibility of the driver.
>
> In ACPI land the kernel
On Wed, 09 May 2001 12:54:00 -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (marius aamodt eriksen) wrote:
> insmod /usr/vice/etc/modload/libafs-2.4.4.o
>
>i get a whole bunch (50 in fact) unresolved symbols. going through
>some of them, i can see that they do in fact exist. for example:
>
> root@gone:~ > grep i
Mark Hahn wrote:
>
> > a P3 machine with a ASUS CUV4X-E motherboard which uses the apollo pro
> > 694X northbridge and a 686B southbridge.
>
> I haven't seen any reports of problem with this; it's the duals that need
> the noapic workaround at the moment.
>
> > An athlon machine with an ASUS A
Greetings.
I recently bought an IBM Ultrastar 18GB Model DDYS-T18350N
which is an UltraSCSI 1 RPM drive. Here are the system
specifications:
DELL Precision 420
- Pentium III at 800MHz
- 256MB worth of RambusDIMMs
- (2) on-board Adaptec aic7899 Ultra160 SCSI adapters
- (1) 9.1GB - Fuj
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> If some page wasn't yet visible in the dirty_pages list by the time
> __sync_one started, we'll find I_DIRTY_PAGES set. This is enforced by
> the locking order (sync_one first clears the I_DIRTY_PAGES and then
> it starts browsing the dirty_pages l
> "AMT" == Andrew M Theurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AMT> I would like to help improve SMP scalability on this workload. If you
AMT> have questions or comments about the above results, or if you are
AMT> conducting similar tests, please send email to
AMT> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have some ide
Daniel writes:
> The ext2 indexing patch is apparently stable but it's still pre-alpha
> until the hash function is finalized. I could see using it to run
> performance tests of ext2+indexing against the alternatives, but only
> if you are prepared to rerun mke2fs later. Then there is the mat
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 07:38:01PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 10 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 07:02:16PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > Why don't you clean I_DIRTY_PAGES ?
> >
> > we don't have visibilty on the inode_lock from there, we
I recently got a ricochet 128k GS wireless modem and I am running it with
kernel 2.4.4 and ppp 2.4.1.
Using the USB connection (configured to operatate at 460kbit) I get up to
2kbyte per second. With serial(at 115kbit) this goes up to 8kbyte per
second.
Why is this?
(Note to all prospective Ri
> It would be great to see a table of ReiserFS/XFS/Ext2+index performance
> results. Well, to make it really fair it should be Ext3+index so I'd
> better add 'backport the patch to 2.2' or 'bug Stephen and friends to
> hurry up' to my to-do list.
You can find a simple benchmark (an average of thr
Well,
Here is the updated version of the patch to add the "priority" argument to
writepage(). All implementations have been fixed.
No referenced bit changes as I still think its not worth passing this
information down to writepage().
Note: I've removed ramfs_writepage(). If there is no writep
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:19:53PM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Thu, 10 May 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > It would be great to see a table of ReiserFS/XFS/Ext2+index performance
> > results. Well, to make it really fair it should be Ext3+index so I'd
> > better add 'backport the patch to 2.2'
Hi there,
I've written a driver for the Amiga multi-serial ZorroII board "A2232"
that I'd like to see included into the main kernel tree.
This is the driver HPA allocated majors 224 and 225 for.
Greetings,
Enver
diff -urN linux/CREDITS linux-2.4.4-a2232/CREDITS
--- linux/CREDITS Sat Apr
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 07:02:16PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Why don't you clean I_DIRTY_PAGES ?
>
> we don't have visibilty on the inode_lock from there, we could make a
> function in fs/inode.c or export the inode_lock to do that, but t
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 07:02:16PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Why don't you clean I_DIRTY_PAGES ?
we don't have visibilty on the inode_lock from there, we could make a
function in fs/inode.c or export the inode_lock to do that, but the flag
will be collected when the inode is released anywa
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 05:08:15PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Why does maestro.c not use my suggestion? Because it doesn't use struct
> pci_driver.
I finally found an able hacker with maestro hardware with power
management. He not only fixed the nasty pm races that were causing
channel corrup
Am Samstag, 5. Mai 2001 09:13 schrieben Sie:
> > My (very) old Athlon 550 (model 1, stepping 2) show it on my MSI MS-6167
> > (AMD Irongate C4) with your 2.4.4-ac5, now :-(
>
> Manfred has a good explanation for that. Im hoping it also explains the
> VIA problem too
>
> > I am open for any test f
Hi, Jeff!
> Basically the PCI core should implement what PM is necessary, because
> eventually struct pci_driver will become a more generic struct driver.
I just wanted to make sure that you don't expect any problems if we go
this way.
> Why does maestro.c not use my suggestion? Because it doe
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> In addition to the two changes I proposed to Andrea's new patch, I
> also realized we might want to do a fdatasync() when locking files. If
> we don't, then locking won't be atomic on mmap()...
>
> Here therefore is Andrea's patch with the changes
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> > highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
>
> Are you using Antons optimisations to samba to use sendfile ?
And you might like to try 2.4.4 (I saw 2.4.
Andrew Theurer wrote:
> I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
> significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
> http://lse.sourceforge.net to post the test data.
The Netfinit
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> It would be great to see a table of ReiserFS/XFS/Ext2+index performance
> results. Well, to make it really fair it should be Ext3+index so I'd
> better add 'backport the patch to 2.2' or 'bug Stephen and friends to
> hurry up' to my to-do list.
Is th
the reference to zyxel (from Jeff G ?) :
>ZyXEL P681 -> firmware v2.50(T.05)b6 | 03/28/2001)
btw: it is already offically release version 2.50(T.05)| 04/13/2001
and the ECN issue is fixed.
I have asked if the developers would ake actoin on the other
routers/firewalls as well to fix the ECN
On Wednesday 09 May 2001 16:49, john slee wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 10:38:14AM +0300, Mart?n Marqu?s wrote:
> > We are waiting for a server with dual PIII, RAID 1,0 and 5 18Gb
> > scsi disks to come so we can change our proxy server, that will run
> > on Linux with Squid. One disk will go i
Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> Let's review: ECC is nice, but it doesn't solve all data corruption
> problems. Applications which do their own end to end data integrity
> checks will catch many more error cases than what ECC catches.
I think you have a wrong idea why the ECC is there. ECC deals with
Hello,
I have uploaded a new release of X15 that hopefully solves all the RFC bugs.
I say hopefully because I haven't had the opportunity to fully test the
request pipelining. Is there anything to automatize such tests?
>From what I could measure X15 is still a good 5% faster than TUX.
You can
Hans Reiser wrote:
> XFS used to have the performance problems that Alan described but fixed them
> in
> the linux port, yes?
>
> Hans
Hmm, we do things somewhat differently on linux, but I suspect most of it
is due to hardware getting faster underneath us.
Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> make distclean deletes anything with size 0. This includes
> directories, while making the kernel in tmpfs or ramfs.
>
Wouldn't it be better to fix tmpfs/ramfs to report something s
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > I dont see where the alternative patch ensures the user didnt flip the
> > direction flag for one
>
> Yeah.
>
> We might as well just make it "eflags & IF", none of the other flags
> should matter (or we explicitly want them
Same patch should be applied for the es1370 also. (at least the joystick
part.)
--
SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 15:36:21 -0400
From: David Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alan Cox wrote:
>> I just unpacked a fresh copy of 2.4.4 and patched it to 2.4.5pre1 and
>> ran into a problem. When I attempt to change the type (through
>> menuconfig) of CPU to compile for, the following gets dumped to the
>> console:
>
>
> Grab the menuconfig diff from the -ac patches .
Use SCSI emulation instead of ATAPI for the tape device. Also make sure
your mt is >= 0.5.
[tim@abit tim]# mt -v
mt-st v. 0.5b
[tim@abit linux]# dump -v
dump 0.4b
[tim@abit linux]# restore -v
restore 0.4b17
[dmesg exerpts - tape is /dev/st0]
...
hdd: HP COLORADO 20GB, ATAPI TAPE drive
...
scsi
> I just unpacked a fresh copy of 2.4.4 and patched it to 2.4.5pre1 and
> ran into a problem. When I attempt to change the type (through
> menuconfig) of CPU to compile for, the following gets dumped to the
> console:
Grab the menuconfig diff from the -ac patches . Menuconfig had a bug in
bra
Steve Lord wrote:
> >
> > XFS is very fast most of the time (deleting a file is so slow its like us
> > ing
> > old BSD systems). Im not familiar enough with its behaviour under Linux yet.
>
> Hmm, I just removed 2.2 Gbytes of data in 3 files in 37 seconds (14.4
> seconds system time), no
Jeff Garzik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> Bill,
>
> Does the attached patch work for you?
Yup, works fine for me (compiled in.)
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.
On Wed, 9 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> > > Let me state it a different way, how is the new writepage() framework
> > > going to do things like ignore the referenced bit during page_launder
> > > for dead swap pages?
> >
> > Its not able to ignore the refe
Daniel writes [re index directories]:
> This is lightly tested and apparently stable.
I was looking at the new patch, and I saw something that puzzles me.
Why do you set the EXT2_INDEX_FL on a new (empty) directory, rather
than only setting it when the dx_root index is created?
Setting the flag
>
> XFS is very fast most of the time (deleting a file is so slow its like us
> ing
> old BSD systems). Im not familiar enough with its behaviour under Linux yet.
Hmm, I just removed 2.2 Gbytes of data in 3 files in 37 seconds (14.4
seconds system time), not tooo slow. And that is on a
Hi,
I just upgraded from kernel 2.2.17 to 2.4.4. I use a Seagate ATAPI tape drive,
model STT2A. I use dump to do backups (probably not relevant).
I have more data regarding tape backup failures. Here is what I get:
* In a full tape dump of about 50MB or so, everything goes smoothly. No erro
Daniel Podlejski wrote:
> In linux-kernel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> : We are waiting for a server with dual PIII, RAID 1,0 and 5 18Gb scsi disks to
> : come so we can change our proxy server, that will run on Linux with Squid.
> : One disk will go inside (I think?) and the other 4 on a tower
Hi,
I just unpacked a fresh copy of 2.4.4 and patched it to 2.4.5pre1 and
ran into a problem. When I attempt to change the type (through
menuconfig) of CPU to compile for, the following gets dumped to the
console:
-[ Start of screendump ]-
scripts/Menuconfig: CONFIG_M386: command no
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> > Let me state it a different way, how is the new writepage() framework
> > going to do things like ignore the referenced bit during page_launder
> > for dead swap pages?
>
> Its not able to ignore the referenced bit.
>
> I know we want that, but I can't see an
Pavel Roskin wrote:
>
> Hi, Jeff!
>
> Thanks for your very (!!!) fast response :-)
>
> > > http://www.red-bean.com/~proski/linux/ymfpci_pm.diff
> >
> > Why not use pci_driver::{suspend,resume} ?
>
> I'm just a bit conservative. There are several drivers that don't use this
> mechanism, notably
Hi,
2.4.3 is the latest kernel that works for me. The symptoms when booting a
later kernel is a clean boot as far as kdm (KDE's xdm replacement). When
logging in there, the system freezes completely about halfway through login.
I can find no messages in the logs, and once /var/log/messages had a
> The kernel ixj.c and associated files are severely out of date and cause
> hard machine hangs when used (kernel 2.4.n). I suggest that the files
> in the telephony directory be brought up to date with the current CVS
> code. At least the CVS code only causes an OOPS and doesn't kill the
>
Hi, Jeff!
Thanks for your very (!!!) fast response :-)
> > http://www.red-bean.com/~proski/linux/ymfpci_pm.diff
>
> Why not use pci_driver::{suspend,resume} ?
I'm just a bit conservative. There are several drivers that don't use this
mechanism, notably trident and maestro. Do you think it's saf
Has anyone got a patch to fix the following error when compiling
2.4.4 on SparcStation 4?
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.4/mm'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.4/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -m32 -pipe -mno-fpu
-fcall-used-g
Here is what happens after several days running with either the kernel
activating DMA or activating it manually (hdparm -d1 /dev/hda) in at
least
2.4.2 through 2.4.5-ac5:
hda: timeout waiting for DMA
ide_dmaproc: chipset supported ide_dma_timeout func only: 14
hda: irq timeout: status=0x80 { Busy
Hi,
I was wondering if there is any mechanism to notify a module of an event
such as arrival of data on a socket. I am trying to find out if a function
in a module can be invoked if such an event occurs. This solves the
problem of polling the socket for data.
Thanks a ton in advance.
Krishnan.
Pavel Roskin wrote:
> If you want to play further with APM and ymfpci, I made a stub for proper
> apm support in the ymfpci driver. It's available here:
>
> http://www.red-bean.com/~proski/linux/ymfpci_pm.diff
Why not use pci_driver::{suspend,resume} ?
> You may need to save some data in memor
The kernel ixj.c and associated files are severely out of date and cause
hard machine hangs when used (kernel 2.4.n). I suggest that the files
in the telephony directory be brought up to date with the current CVS
code. At least the CVS code only causes an OOPS and doesn't kill the
whole mach
On Wed, 9 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> > You want writepage() to check/clean the referenced bit and move the page
> > to the active list itself ?
>
> Well, that's the other part of what my patch was doing.
>
> Let me state it a different way, how is the ne
Hi, Pete!
Next time you are asking my opinion please cc: me, so that I can quote
you.
Yes, I think you have fixed a terrible bug in ymfpci. Decoding only 10-bit
addresses is extremely dangerous, considering that only 388-38b is
reserved, while 788-78b etc are not.
In order to get your patch acc
Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> You want writepage() to check/clean the referenced bit and move the page
> to the active list itself ?
Well, that's the other part of what my patch was doing.
Let me state it a different way, how is the new writepage() framework
going to do things like ignore the ref
In linux-kernel, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: We are waiting for a server with dual PIII, RAID 1,0 and 5 18Gb scsi disks to
: come so we can change our proxy server, that will run on Linux with Squid.
: One disk will go inside (I think?) and the other 4 on a tower conected to the
: RAID, whic
On Wed, 9 May 2001, [ISO-8859-1] Gérard Roudier wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 May 2001, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > which is a text version of the paper I mentioned before. The basic
> > > message of the paper is that it really doesn't help much to have thi
The documentation for the es1371 driver doesn't mention how to
activate/specify the joystick port's base address (I had to look in the
code). This patch fixes it. The same probably applies to the es1370 as
well as other cards, but lacking said cards, I couldn't say for sure.
You may wish to re-
Ok, what prevents this from happening:
CPU0CPU1
try_to_swap_out()
...
entry = get_swap_page();
if (!entry.val)
goto out_unlock_restore;
swapin_readahead()
finds valid swap entry just allocate
Pete Zaitcev writes:
> A fix in pci remove does not fix regular processing.
I see. Here is where I was confused.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
Andris Pavenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>With kernels 2.4.4-ac[356] I'm getting system freezing on FTP transfer after
>some time. I'm trying to upload about 6.5Mb file using MC (transfer speed
> about 300-1000Kb/s). With these kernel versions I'm getting random total
>freezing system (no any
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:08:31PM -0400, God wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 May 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> >
> > > 2) They certainly are. Every once in a while they go through a period of
> > >silently dropping all email coming from hosts that don't h
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
> On Tue, 8 May 2001, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > which is a text version of the paper I mentioned before. The basic
> > message of the paper is that it really doesn't help much to have things
> > like ECC unless you can be sure that 100% of the rest of your sy
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > May 9 10:05:11 localhost kernel: EIP:0010:[call_policy+427/608]
>
> I saw it before, but was unable to track it down.
> What is your kernel version?
>
> -- Pete
I'm running 2.4.4-ac6 right now. It also does it in ac5 and 2.4.5-pre1.
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Tue, 8 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> Marcelo Tosatti writes:
> > Ok, this patch implements thet thing and also changes ext2+swap+shm
> > writepage operations (so I could test the thing).
> >
> > The performance is better with the patch on my restricted swapping tests.
>
> Nice.
> and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
> themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
> sections when you distribute them as separate works.
>
> For example, suppose I ship you a tarball that has the source & binaries
> for both a
george anzinger wrote:
>
> Eli Carter wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I did a quick look in include/linux for a standard implementation of an
> > array-based circular queue, but I didn't see one.
> >
> > I was thinking something that could be declared, allocated, and then
> > used with an addq and a
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 01:08:31PM -0400, God wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> > 2) They certainly are. Every once in a while they go through a period of
> >silently dropping all email coming from hosts that don't have PTRs.
> >This would be no worse.
>
> ACK
> If the free software community understood and accepted this, by the
way,
> then I think that it removes the need for the LGPL, it's redundant.
What is when compiling a DOS/DJGPP programme? IIRC it is statically
linked
to the libc-dos. IIRC the LGPL here prevents the remaining DOS programme
code
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 07:06:38PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > As part of our operating system / networking research, we have
> > written a loadable kernel module for Linux. We would like to
> > distribute the source but we're not sure if our development
> > office will allow us to release it unde
Hi there,
make distclean deletes anything with size 0. This includes
directories, while making the kernel in tmpfs or ramfs.
This patch solves it, by not deleting directories in this rule.
Patch applies to any official kernel and with offsets even to
recent ac series.
--- linux-2.4.2-ac19/Make
I have a proxy server that's been running 2.4.3pre4 with reiserfs for the
partitions on the cache disks. it has an uptime of 43 days at this point.
it wasn't very stable at all (two crashes in one week) with 2.4.2. I'll be
building 2.4.4 something when I get back from ghana to the US, but I don't
> From: "David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 17:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
> Ummm... What Alan's saying is:
>
> 1) Whatever driver is trying to shut down from IRQ context
>is broken must be fixed. pci_pool is fine.
>
> 2) The Documentation/ files which suggest that such dev
Alan Cox wrote:
> > that reiserfs has had lots of bugs, and is marked as experimental in kernel
> > 2.4.4. Not to mention that the people of RH discourage there users from using
> > it.
>
> At the time Red Hat 7.1 was mastered Reiserfs was not stable. The reiserfs in
> the RH kernel has some of t
> > Well, 2.4.0 does not seem to be able to talk to
> > the card. The first sign of trouble is the lines:
> >
> > cs: socket c13d4800 timed out during reset.
> > Try increasing setup_delay.
> >
> > at the point where other kernels say instead:
> >
> > cs: cb_alloc(bus 5): vendor 0x10b7, device
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Mark Hemment wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Actually, the change was made because it is illogical to try only
> > once on multi-order pages. Especially because we depend upon order
> > 1 pages so much (every task struct allocated). We depend up
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:50:15PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:40:25PM -0500, Steve Best wrote:
>> Release 0.3.1 of JFS was made available today.
>>
>> Drop 31 on May 9, 2001 (jfs-0.3.1.tar.gz) includes fixes to the
>> file system and utilities.
>>
>> For more deta
Eli Carter wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I did a quick look in include/linux for a standard implementation of an
> array-based circular queue, but I didn't see one.
>
> I was thinking something that could be declared, allocated, and then
> used with an addq and a removeq. A deallocator would also be goo
> As part of our operating system / networking research, we have
> written a loadable kernel module for Linux. We would like to
> distribute the source but we're not sure if our development
> office will allow us to release it under the GPL (at least
> initially). Before meeting with the lawyers
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > switching it back on, a problem occurs with reenabling the ports on
> > that USB hub. The kernel output follows.
>
> > Comments anyone?
>
> Next time, post your /proc/version.
I thought this was unnecessary in this case, because my mail headers
nicely reveal which ver
It appears that Linus Torvalds has stated that it is possible
to have a non-GPL'd (or even binary only) Linux device driver
kernel module dynamically linked to the kernel "assuming all
the nasty requirements are met." [see reference below]
What, specifically, are the "nasty requirements?"
* Is
Hi Steve,
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:40:25PM -0500, Steve Best wrote:
> Release 0.3.1 of JFS was made available today.
>
> Drop 31 on May 9, 2001 (jfs-0.3.1.tar.gz) includes fixes to the
> file system and utilities.
>
> For more details about the problems fixed, please see the README.
would it
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> > highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
>
> Are you using Antons optimisations to samba to use sendfile ?
>
> Alan
Not yet. As I understand it, we need a supported ni
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:God <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Agreed. For now ECN has been disabled here. I got tired of so many sites
> not supporting it that I gave up. Maybe by 2.8.x kernels it will be worth
> turning back on. Thats not to say h
Release 0.3.1 of JFS was made available today.
Drop 31 on May 9, 2001 (jfs-0.3.1.tar.gz) includes fixes to the
file system and utilities.
For more details about the problems fixed, please see the README.
Steve
JFS for Linux http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jfs
-
To uns
> significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
Are you using Antons optimisations to samba to use sendfile ?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the b
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:30:35PM -0500, Andrew M. Theurer wrote:
> I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
> significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
> highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
> http://lse.sourcefo
Hi
sorry for the delay, it is working for your motherboard the
lastest kernels of Mandrake? I think that all the problems
have been solved?
Sorry for the delay, as I was finishing more things.
Later, Juan.
> "wayne" == Wayne Whitney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wa
I do have kernprof ACG and lockmeter for a 4P run. We saw no
significant problems with lockmeter. csum_partial_copy_generic was the
highest % in profile, at 4.34%. I'll see if we can get some space on
http://lse.sourceforge.net to post the test data.
Andrew Theurer
Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
> On
- PPP
| | POS 1
| | /
10.10.28.10/30
| | /
|
> May 9 10:05:11 localhost kernel: EIP:0010:[call_policy+427/608]
I saw it before, but was unable to track it down.
What is your kernel version?
-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo inf
> from the interrupt back to the driver. This is not unlike what you must
> already be doing for interrupt completion.
>
> Do pay attention to getting the timer (&t->timer above) properly set up
> (see my first response or most any usage in the kernel).
>
> Have I got this right Alan?
The othe
> The only way a motherboard BIOS would know if the PCI BIOS used polling
> methods instead of interrupt methods is if it was a built in device. For all
Such as the motherboard IDE ?
> for all bootable devices on the system, regardless of PnPOS settings. Name
> one concrete example of a mother
> switching it back on, a problem occurs with reenabling the ports on
> that USB hub. The kernel output follows.
> Comments anyone?
Next time, post your /proc/version.
There were similar things recently (missing urb->dev
reinitialization in usb_hub_reset).
-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this li
Hi Alan,
can you apply this patch to next 2.4.4-acX ? This fixes problem with
gcc3.0 (20010426) unable to compile this under some conditions. As
__up_write() uses same code ("i" instead of tmp variable), I think
that you should apply this. It can cause slower code, as gcc cannot
move "movl -
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> 2) They certainly are. Every once in a while they go through a period of
>silently dropping all email coming from hosts that don't have PTRs.
>This would be no worse.
ACK Which do you mean? :
-Hosts that don't have valid PTRs (which wou
Alan Cox wrote:
> > setup all possible boot devices, only devices non-essential to the boot
> > process (sound cards, modems, crap like that) get left unconfigured. Not
>
> It only has to do minimal setup on them. If the BIOS calls are polled then
> assigning an IRQ is quite optional
The only
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > while(!!time_before(jiffies, timer))
> > {
> > if(!!(*event & mask))
> > {
> > stat = 0;
> > break;
> > }
> > schedule();
>
> You want to yield as well otherwise you may just spin anyway
>
> > Both of these pr
Hi all,
I have an USB hub built into my monitor (Eizo T761) which disconnects
and powers down the hub when the monitor gets switched off. After
switching it back on, a problem occurs with reenabling the ports on
that USB hub. The kernel output follows.
Comments anyone?
Regards,
Udo.
[Detect
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Pekka Savola wrote:
> To: Matthew Geier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Matthew Geier wrote:
> > > Help is needed to contact these site owners and politely using a standard
> > > email ask them that their site was non-conformant.
[snip]
> >
> >
> > I tried to
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
