On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:53:36PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > Iff CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECS is set then yes, doing schedule is better.
> > > But I do not see any benefit in doing
> > >
> > > unsigned long timeout = jiffies + ((HZ + 19)/20) + 1;
> > > whi
Hi,
On 08 Feb 2001, Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But, there is an easy solution:
> [root@localhost scripts]# ifconfig --version
> net-tools 1.57
> ifconfig 1.40 (2000-05-21)
>
> I replaced the old code for Net-tools with this:
>
> ifconfig --version 2>&1 | grep tools | aw
Hi
Yes the problem was what Sir Alan Cox told, when i called my
device driver poll function after making the TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, it made
the process state again to RUNNING (In a rpc_call() function).
Thanx
#
I don't know if it should work or not but using a VIA Rhine compatible card
on my LX164 locks it solid when transfering large packets:
ping -f host.on.100mbit.lan works
ping -f -s 1024 same.host locks it solid as does
untarring to a NFS mount.
No oops/panic, just locks solid.
Kaj-Michael Lang
[E
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:58:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By author:Gerhard Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Thanklfully bind 9 barfs if you even try this sort of thing.
> >
>
> Personally I find it puzzling what's
Hi, I've been experiencing numerous problems with the 3c509 driver in 2.4.1.
When I force it to go to both cards (ether=10,0x300,eth0
ether=11,0x210,eth1), they both act strange (and also claim to be BNC when
they are both TP). The link light at the hub flashes three times
repeatedly.
Donald Bec
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, christophe barbe wrote:
> Ok it seems not important to have a nice boot process but each time you show a linux
>machine to a M$ normal user (normal = not a programmer) his first reaction is
>something like ""what are all these strange output lines?". And it's the first thing
Hello all,
Recently I try to upgrade kernel 2.2.x to 2.4.x (the problem occur
both for 2.4.0 and 2.4.1). When I use kernel 2.2.x before and use the serial modem to
connect internet and telnet to some Chinese bbs ( in which 8-bit character is used,e.g
bbs.e-fever.org ,bbs.org.hk ,it wor
Werner Almesberger writes:
> This patch for 2.4.2-pre1 adds a few includes I forgot in sch_atm.c and
> sch_dsmark.c
Applied, thanks.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, I now know the cause of this problem. It's a bug in
the ipx driver. (This also closes pcmcia-cs bug #126563.)
Through copious use of printk()s I was able to track down
the point at which the dev->refcnt for my card was being
erroneously decremented. It was being erroneously decremented
b
Hi,
What you describe below is having the client mis-addressed to have
the same IP as the server. Is this what you meant?
skd
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:09:49PM -0800, dean gaudet wrote:
> this appears to occur with both 2.2.16 and 2.4.1.
>
> server:
>
> eth0 is 192.168.250.11 netmask 255.2
replying to myself..
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Paul Jakma wrote:
> why put in mga specific code?
last time i asked why 2x74x hardware iommu wasn't supported i was told
something along the lines of cause generic kernel driver interfaces
wouldn't support it. so support for the alpha hardware would requ
oops typo.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
> this appears to occur with both 2.2.16 and 2.4.1.
>
> server:
>
> eth0 is 192.168.250.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
> eth1 is 192.168.251.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> they're both connected to the same switch.
>
> client:
>
> eth0 is 192.168.251.11
this appears to occur with both 2.2.16 and 2.4.1.
server:
eth0 is 192.168.250.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
eth1 is 192.168.251.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
they're both connected to the same switch.
client:
eth0 is 192.168.251.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
connected to the same switch as both of server's
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alex Deucher wrote:
> There is preliminary support for pcigart in the dri tree. I believe
> some people have had some success with it.
but there doesn't need to be. DEC 2x17x Alpha chipsets have an IOMMU
for hardware scatter-gather support. (ie generic agpgart for the PCI
bu
This problem has been resolved (sort of). See the follow up to
"[PATCH] to deal with bad dev->refcnt in unregister_netdevice()"
Thomas Hood
> Here is a patch which may not solve the underlying
> problem but which does prevent the kernel from
> generating an infinite number of error messages
>
Dear Kernel Gurus
Sorry if this is a bit of a repeat - I think the prior message was
incorrectly addressed.
System Dual 500 Mhz Pentium III 256MB ram with Adaptec 2940
UW scsi controller - WD disc and HP DAT tape.
I have been getting kernel panics when doing backups over the
network. I have
hi.
i desperately hope this is not too stupid.
i'm trying to write a driver which depends on giving pci devices
access to somewhat larger amounts of pysical memory. let's say, a
megabyte of contiguous ram.
is it possible to resize such an area later on? i mean: is there some
mechanism availabl
On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 01:50:04AM +, Aaron Denney wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But, wait a minute. CNAME -> CNAME is a "must not".
> Cite the RFC please. 1034 says
> # Domain names in RRs which point at another name should always point at
> # the primary
The maestro3 driver, included in 2.4.2-pre2 (which I assume is the
same as maestro3-2.4-20010204.tar.gz, I haven't bothered to try it;
I'm perfectly happy w/ my patch), oopses upon shutdown.
I'm submitting my patch again, both to the maestro3 maintainer,
and to lk this time; please see fit to ass
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 01:50:00PM +, John Levon wrote:
> +
> + For more complicated module unload locking requirements, you can set the
> + can_unload function pointer to your own routine,
> + which should return 0 if the module is
> + unloadable, or -EBUSY otherwise.
s/is unloadab
Jochen Striepe wrote:
> tolot:/root # hostname --version
> hostname (GNU sh-utils) 2.0.11
> Written by Jim Meyering.
AFAIK, all distributions use hostname from net-tools, not from
sh-utils.
% hostname -V
net-tools 1.57
hostname 1.99 (2000-02-13)
Why duplicate it (on Linux) ?
--
Frédéric L. W
On Thursday 08 February 2001 14:31, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> On 08 Feb 2001, Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have modified the scripts/ver_linux script to provide the following:
>
> [...]
>
> > hostname -V 2>&1 | awk 'NR==1{print "Net-tools ", $NF}'
>
> *P
Michael H. Warfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, wait a minute. CNAME -> CNAME is a "must not".
Cite the RFC please. 1034 says
# Domain names in RRs which point at another name should always point at
# the primary name and not the alias.
and
# domain software should not fail when pr
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 08:12:39PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
> >
> > 2.4.1-ac7
> > o Rebalance the 2.4.1 VM (Rik van Riel)
> > | This should make things feel a l
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
dean gaudet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>if you've got 512Mb of RAM you end up with a dentry cache of order 7 --
>65536 entries.
>
>this results in a D_HASHBITS of 16. if you look at d_hash it contains
>this code:
>
> hash = hash ^ (hash >> D_HASHBITS) ^ (h
Ok, the patch is reasonably big, mainly due to a new architecture (cris)
and some updates to others (arm and mips).
But what's interesting here are actually three very small patches:
- mm/memory.c (PageReserved() check): this could corrupt the shared zero
page if you used direct IO, and thu
Hi!
root@tilde:~# lsmod
Module Size Used by
root@tilde:~# lsmod
Module Size Used by
root@tilde:~# insmod airo
Using /lib/modules/2.4.1-ac7/pcmcia/airo.o
root@tilde:~# lsmod
Module Size Used by
airo 25232 0 (unused)
root@ti
This patch for 2.4.2-pre1 adds a few includes I forgot in sch_atm.c and
sch_dsmark.c
Their absence didn't cause any kernel compilation problems, but it may
well in the future (or when compiling things in a different context,
that's why I, ehm ... finally, noticed the problem).
- Werner
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Donald Becker wrote:
> > Or we can just tell people, "hey, don't use this 64-bit PCI card on a real
> > 64-bit system, it's broken by design"? I don't think that's a good
> > solution either.
>
> This is not a 64 bit PCI issue.
I know. It was just an ironic comment: we h
Dunlap, Randy wrote:
>> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>> This is actually a repost of a problem that received few
>> serious replies (IMNSHO).
>
>
> Well, I claim not to have ignored it.
> I have gone thru the entire patch-2.4.1 file and can't see
> anything there that
This patch removes a redundant call to vm_enough_memory from
mm/mmap.c:sys_brk. Exactly the same test is made in mm/mmap.c:do_brk,
with the exception that the latter is done after calling do_munmap.
Note that do_munmap in do_brk has no effect when called from sys_brk,
because the check for find_v
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001, Michael H. Warfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, wait a minute. CNAME -> CNAME is a "must not". MX -> CNAME
> is a "should not". The "should not" leaves it to be implimentation
> dependent and not an outright ban. Sooo...
Actually, I had this conversation rece
that appears to do it :)
-dean
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> dean gaudet writes:
> > also, for order > 7, was the real intention to use a shift of
> > (order*2)&31?
>
> No, the whole thing is buggered. How stupid, my fault.
> It was the 64-bit platform fascist at work :-)
>
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Donald Becker wrote:
>
> > > > The align-copy should *never* be required because the alignment differs
> > > > between DIX and E-II encapsulated packets. The machine shouldn't crash
> > > > because someone sends you a different enca
Hi,
Seems aic7xxx.h got lost.
--- drivers/scsi/hosts.c.orig Thu Feb 8 16:32:00 2001
+++ drivers/scsi/hosts.cThu Feb 8 16:29:48 2001
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_AIC7XXX
-#include "aic7xxx.h"
+#include "aic7xxx/aic7xxx.h"
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCSI_IPS
--
Shane
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:11:39PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> >
> > > Please explain how there is any different between an CNAME or MX pointing
> > > to an A record in a different SOA versus an MX pointing to a CNAME
> > > pointing to an A record where at least
I presume that this change needs to be made.
(All of the drivers/net/pcmcia/*.c need the change.)
// Thomas
jdthood@thanatos:/usr/src/kernel-source-2.4.1-ac3/drivers/net/pcmcia# diff -Naur
xirc2ps_cs.c_ORIG xirc2ps_cs.c
--- xirc2ps_cs.c_ORIG Thu Feb 8 19:11:54 2001
+++ xirc2ps_cs.cTh
> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> This is actually a repost of a problem that received few
> serious replies (IMNSHO).
Well, I claim not to have ignored it.
I have gone thru the entire patch-2.4.1 file and can't see
anything there that would cause what you are seeing.
Yo
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>
> > Please explain how there is any different between an CNAME or MX pointing
> > to an A record in a different SOA versus an MX pointing to a CNAME
> > pointing to an A record where at least one pair is local (same SOA).
>
> Ah! But now you are placing co
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> >The MII read code is no longer reliable. I spent twenty minutes at
> >the show, but couldn't figure out the problem. I haven't been able
> >reproduce the problem locally with my 2.2 code and someone older
> >hardware.
>
> Yes, I've no
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:01:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > Wouldn't that be true for any CNAME anyway?
> > That's the point...
> > In other words, you do a lookup, you start with a primary lookup
> > and then possibly a second lookup to resolve an MX or CNAME. It's o
Russell King wrote:
>
> Neil Brown writes:
> > On Wednesday February 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > This is a weird problem that I am looking at right. It seems to indicate a
> > > bug in the nfs server.
> > >
> > > I have a MIPS machine that boots from a NFS root fs hosted on a redhat 6.2
>
>
> > Wouldn't that be true for any CNAME anyway?
>
> That's the point...
>
> In other words, you do a lookup, you start with a primary lookup
> and then possibly a second lookup to resolve an MX or CNAME. It's only
> the MX that points to a CNAME that results in yet another lo
This is a repost of a problem that received few serious replies (IMNSHO).
Basically 2.4.0 detects 192 MB(maybe 191, but big whoop) of memory. This
is correct. However, 2.4.1-ac6 (as did Linus-blessed 2.4.1) detects 64.
The problem is simple. 2.4.1 and later for some reason (with my
motherboard/
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:47:17PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> "Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:58:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > By author:Gerhard Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:58:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > By author:Gerhard Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > >
> > > Thanklfully bind 9 barfs if you even try this sort of thing.
> >
On 9 Feb 01 at 0:06, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:32:01 MET-1, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> >I have another question for UP APIC NMI: As I reported some time ago,
> >if performance counters overflow when LVTPC has 'disabled' bit set,
> >NMI is lost forever. This causes problems
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Jeremy M. Dolan]
> > Disk is spelled 'disk' except for Compact Disc and Digital Versatile
> > Disc. If it wasn't 3:30 in the morning, a patch would be attached.
>
> It wouldn't do any good. Many months ago, Ted Ts'o pleaded with
> Richard Gooch (devfs author, from Au
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 02:58:30PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By author:Gerhard Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Thanklfully bind 9 barfs if you even try this sort of thing.
> >
> Personally I find it puzzling what's wr
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:"David L. Nicol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> How hard would it be to add? The limitation on fifos that you get the same
> one every time you open it makes some things tricky -- the server has to
> move the fifo and mkfifo
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:32:01 MET-1, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>I have another question for UP APIC NMI: As I reported some time ago,
>if performance counters overflow when LVTPC has 'disabled' bit set,
>NMI is lost forever. This causes problems with VMware - it has to
>disable NMI deliveries during CR
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 11:52:54AM -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
> This is actually a repost of a problem that received few serious replies
> (IMNSHO).
>
> Basically 2.4.0 detects 192 MB(maybe 191, but big whoop) of memory. This
> is correct. However, 2.4.1-ac6 (as did Linus-blessed 2.4.1) de
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Gerhard Mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> Thanklfully bind 9 barfs if you even try this sort of thing.
>
Personally I find it puzzling what's wrong with MX -> CNAME at all; it
seems like a useful setup without the pitfalls
Courtesy of Manish Singh, little bit extended
(I hope I did not break it too badly).
Supposedly it fixes bad skipping with xmms.
-- Pete
diff -ur -X dontdiff linux-2.4.1/drivers/sound/ymfpci.c
linux-2.4.1-p3/drivers/sound/ymfpci.c
--- linux-2.4.1/drivers/sound/ymfpci.c Fri Jan 26 23:31:16 2001
> > kernel: PAP-5660: reiserfs_do_truncate: wrong result -1 of search for
> > [7906789 7906806 0xfff DIRECT]
> > .
>
> These aren't good at all, and show a general corruption problem. I know the ac
>kernels have at least one small DAC960 bug fixes, are there other fixes pending
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Torben Mathiasen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
> > >
> > > 2.4.1-ac7
> > > o Rebalance the 2.4.1 VM (Rik van Riel)
> > > |
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 08:10:45PM +0100, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> > In serial.c, you seem to perform a check by writing to a possible
> > modem's interrupt enable register and reading the result. This seems to
> > be one of the points at which the auto-configuration process occasionally
> > f
On Thu, Feb 08 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
> >
> > 2.4.1-ac7
> > o Rebalance the 2.4.1 VM (Rik van Riel)
> > | This should make things feel a lot faster especially
On Thursday, February 08, 2001 04:00:26 PM +0100 Andrius Adomaitis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have dual PIII 800 machine running as mail server on DAC 960 RAID &
> reiserfs comming with 2.4.1kernel.
>
> Under very high loads I get following messages in my kernel log:
>
Henning P. Schmiedehausen writes:
> "threads is salt" quote of davem.
Please attribute things correctly, even though I agree with it
these aren't my words, they are Larry McVoy's.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Donald Becker wrote:
> > > The align-copy should *never* be required because the alignment differs
> > > between DIX and E-II encapsulated packets. The machine shouldn't crash
> > > because someone sends you a different encapsulation type!
>
> This is true for a number of dr
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
>
> 2.4.1-ac7
> o Rebalance the 2.4.1 VM (Rik van Riel)
> | This should make things feel a lot faster especially
> | on small boxes .. feedback to Rik
I'd
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Well at least let's do it the Linux Kernel Way(tm): separate out the
> zerocopy stuff such that there are minimal ifdefs in the code... For
> example:
>
> /* add these functions... */
> #ifdef ZEROCOPY
> static inline setup_txrx_rings(
Alan,
Please apply attached patch for the next ac release (it is gzipped to
ensure integrity of white space and it's also smaller that way).
Have tested it to compile both as module and in kernel and tested
functionality when compiled in. - Tests are fine.
Note I consider this patch fully stabl
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Well, I decided to bite the bullet and port my zerocopy starfire
> > changes to the official tree, properly ifdef'ed. So here it goes,
>
> I would prefer that the zerocopy changes stay in DaveM's external patch
> until they are ready to be merged. Zeroc
Linus,
Here is a patch that fixes some IrDA problems with speed
changes in the IrLAP layer, and also a missing kfree's in all
of the IrDA device drivers. This patch is also credited
Jean Tourrilhes. It's been tested for a month or so by
the Linux-IrDA mailing-list, and found to be working OK.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Doug Ledford wrote:
> Thanks, I hoped it would ;-) It's amazing what happens when you have a bcopy
> in assembly that's missing the source address initialization :-(
Yes! The output from the description of my SCSI hds when the driver
initialised was highly amusing (containing
Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> two mistakes:
>
> a) [EMAIL PROTECTED], not veritas.com! (it was pine, not me -- default
> domain etc :)
>
> b) it was ac6 which fixed it, not ac7 (but I am running ac7)
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>
> > Doug,
> >
> > I confirm that ac7 fixed all
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Martin Braun wrote:
> > I can not get sound working on a computer with a Gigabyte
> > GA-7ZX mainboard (KT133 chipset). Is this a known problem?
> > I have attached some config info. Mail me for further details.
>
> > $ cat /proc/driver/via/0/*
> > Vendor name : Sigma
Thanklfully bind 9 barfs if you even try this sort of thing.
Gerhard
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matti Aarnio) writes:
>
> >NSes and MXes must ALWAYS point to NAMEs with A//A6 records for
> >them, specifically those names MUST NOT be CN
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> What about changing the default for rx_copybreak instead?
> Set it to 1536 on ia64 and Alpha, 0 for the rest.
> tulip and eepro100 use that aproach.
That makes a lot of sense, thanks for the suggestion. I'll do so in the
next version.
Ion
--
It i
Ion Badulescu wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > I would prefer that the zerocopy changes stay in DaveM's external patch
> > until they are ready to be merged.
>
> I would actually prefer to have a single source for all the driver
> versions. The 2.2.x version I sent to Ala
Ion Badulescu wrote:
>
> > > +#if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__alpha__)
> > > +#define PKT_SHOULD_COPY(pkt_len) 1
> > > +#else
> > > +#define PKT_SHOULD_COPY(pkt_len) (pkt_len < rx_copybreak)
> > > +#endif
> >
> [snip]
>
> It's not *required* per se, as far as I know both the Alpha
Hi,
On 08 Feb 2001, Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have modified the scripts/ver_linux script to provide the following:
>
[...]
>
> hostname -V 2>&1 | awk 'NR==1{print "Net-tools ", $NF}'
*Please* consider modifying this. There might be a problem:
tolot:/root #
At 19:33 08/02/01, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> > I confirm that ac7 fixed all the aic7xxx problems on my machine.
me,too (-:
AHA2940UW dual channel adapter (on board a SMP Tyan Thunder Pro 100 GX440
mobo).
-ac5 crashed on boot at SCSI init.
-ac6 unteste
Of all the fields in /proc/cpuinfo, which ones aren't fixed (as long as
you keep the same processor)?
According to the HOWTO I know bogomips can change.
What about flags/features? Can things be done to a CPU to change the
flags?
Is cpu MHz a real measurement of the speed the CPU is running, or
Linus,
Please apply this patch to your latest 2.4 code. It contains
cleanups to the irda QoS code by Jean Tourrilhes.
-- Dag
diff -u -p linux/include/net/irda/qos.d6.h linux/include/net/irda/qos.h
--- linux/include/net/irda/qos.d6.h Thu Jan 11 14:28:26 2001
+++ linux/include/net/irda/qos.h
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I would prefer that the zerocopy changes stay in DaveM's external patch
> until they are ready to be merged.
I would actually prefer to have a single source for all the driver
versions. The 2.2.x version I sent to Alan later on actually compiles on
2.
Since 2.4.0-test5, line2 on my Soundblaster 128 soundcard, which is
connected to on my hauppauge winTV/pci TV card has been silent.
I sure have turned line2 on with a mixer program.
The external line connector sounds OK.
lspci says:
00:0a.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1370 [AudioPCI] (
Linus,
Here is a patch that fixes the problem of attaching to IrLAN
devices in Linux-2.4.1.
The problem was that the IrLAN driver forgot to memorize the
hardware address of the remote device and instead used the
broadcast address, which sometimes did work, but not always
(since doing so is actu
I have modified the scripts/ver_linux script to provide the following:
1) The order of version checks is now the same as the list in the
Current Minimal Requirements section of Documentation/Changes
for easier comparison.
2) Made capitalization consistent with the list in Changes.
3) Added
Linus,
Here is a patch that fixes a kernel crash people have
experiended when using IrDA dongles with Linux-2.4.
The problem was that the netdev was deallocated a bit
to early at close time.
Please apply to your latest 2.4 code.
-- Dag
--- linux/drivers/net/irda/irtty.c.orig Sun Jan 21 23:35
Ion Badulescu wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Wed, 07 Feb 2001 14:57:16 -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here's the patch I have, against vanilla 2.4.2-pre1, with the
> > pci_enable_device preferred changes included...
>
> Well, I decided to bite the bullet and port my zerocopy s
Bakonyi Ferenc wrote:
> /me wrote:
>
>> Louis Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using XFree86-4.0.1 with the nv driver. You are right, it's ver
>>> 0.9.2 for the fb.
>>>
>>> Where can I get the patch? Should I upgrade to XFree86-4.0.2?
>>
>> Not yet, we have to write that patch fi
Hi !
I experienced a Oops with all versions of the kernel newer than 2.2.x :
Here is the Oops processed by ksymoops. In this case, it was with
2.4.1-ac6.
This oops seems related to ax25 (hamradio) use. I can have access to
magic keys
(but the reboot one, but I _never_ managed to have this one t
Greg KH wrote:
> Silently changing descriptor ids while connected is just asking for
> trouble :)
Ok, fair enough - here's a patch against 2.4.1-ac6 which causes the
device to disconnect/reconnect after firmware load (and a couple other
minor kernel logging & formatting cleanups, plus one more d
Neil Brown writes:
> On Wednesday February 7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > This is a weird problem that I am looking at right. It seems to indicate a
> > bug in the nfs server.
> >
> > I have a MIPS machine that boots from a NFS root fs hosted on a redhat 6.2
> > workstation. Everything works f
Martin Braun wrote:
> I can not get sound working on a computer with a Gigabyte
> GA-7ZX mainboard (KT133 chipset). Is this a known problem?
> I have attached some config info. Mail me for further details.
> $ cat /proc/driver/via/0/*
> Vendor name : SigmaTel STAC
> Vendor id: 83
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 03:52:35PM +0100, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> > How do you write high-performance ftp server without threads if select
> > on regular file always returns "ready"?
>
> No, it's not really possible on Linux. Use SYS$QIO call on VMS :-)
Ahh, but even VMS SYS$QIO is sync
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tony Finch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>Tony, are people using the TCP_NOPUSH define as a way to detect
>>the presence of T/TCP support?
>
>No, MSG_EOF is the right way to do that.
However, I think ank is at least partially
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Martin Mares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>What leads you to your belief it's correct? The lspci dump Adam has sent
>to the list shows that there's something utterly wrong with our understanding
>of the ServerWorks config registers -- they seem to say that the prim
Doug,
I confirm that ac7 fixed all the aic7xxx problems on my machine.
Thanks,
Tigran
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
two mistakes:
a) [EMAIL PROTECTED], not veritas.com! (it was pine, not me -- default
domain etc :)
b) it was ac6 which fixed it, not ac7 (but I am running ac7)
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Doug,
>
> I confirm that ac7 fixed all the aic7xxx problems on my machine.
>
> Thanks,
Hello!
> Here is a patch which may not solve the underlying
This does not. refcnt cannot be <1 at this point.
> assuming that the latter messages aren't serious?
They are fatal. Machine must be rebooted after them.
> I hope the networking gurus can find the real bugs here.
Well, someone fo
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> "Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> >
> > > "Richard B. Johnson" wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > Another problem with 'volatile' has to do with pointers. When
> > > > it's possible for some object to
Hello all
I can not get sound working on a computer with a Gigabyte
GA-7ZX mainboard (KT133 chipset). Is this a known problem?
I have attached some config info. Mail me for further details.
Thanks in advance,
Martin Braun
--
+-+--
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.1-ac7
o Rebalance the 2.4.1 VM (Rik van Riel)
| This should make things feel a lot faster especially
| on small boxes .. feedback to Rik
o Silence osf syscall error printk
Hi,
I was trying out a modem on RedHat 7 running kernel 2.2.16 and when trying
to upload a file via ftp I get an OOPS.
I am using pppd version 2.4.0 on a Pentium III 450 with 128MB of RAM.
Here is the output of kysymoops:
[root@cpagano_redhat7 cpagano]# ksymoops oops.feb8.txt -m /boot/System.
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 8 Feb 01 at 13:14, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > Jeff Hartmann wrote:
> > > Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> > > It does not use dynamic DMA mapping, because it doesn't do PCI DMA at
> > > all. It uses AGP DMA. Actually, it shouldn't be too hard to get it to
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
