ignore

2000-12-21 Thread Byeong-ryeol Kim
Is there any event lately in vger kernel-list? I haven't been being received mails from it since Dec 17. -- "Where there is a will, there is a way." [EMAIL PROTECTED] For the future of you and me!hitel: jinbo21 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ke

Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2

2000-12-21 Thread Andrew Morton
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > Other thing about your patch, adding TASK_EXCLUSIVE to > > > wake_up/wake_up_interruptible is useless. > > > > This enables wake_up_all(). > > It is useless as it is in 2.2.19pre2: there's no wake_up_all in 2.2.19pre2. #define wake_up_all(x) __wake_up((x),TASK_UN

Re: recommended gcc compiler version

2000-12-21 Thread Tim Wright
I'm sorry but this is incorrect. The recommended compiler version is not longer the same for the 2.2 and 2.4 kernels. >From Documentation/Changes in 2.4 (test12): "The recommended compiler for the kernel is egcs 1.1.2 (gcc 2.91.66), and it should be used when you need absolute stability. You may u

Re: recommended gcc compiler version

2000-12-21 Thread Barry K. Nathan
Robert B. Easter wrote: > This is a newbie question, but what are the recommended gcc compiler versions > for compiling, This is discussed in the Documentation/Changes file, in a given kernel's source. Brief summaries follow (which assume you're using an x86 CPU). > Linux 2.2.18? gcc 2.7.2.3 i

The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux (fwd)

2000-12-21 Thread Mike A. Harris
Anyone looked into this? -- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate This message is copyright 2000, all rights reserved. Views expressed are my own, not necessarily shared by my employer. --

2.4.0-test13 drivers/net/pcmcia fix

2000-12-21 Thread Wayne . Brown
The files in drivers/net/pcmcia are skipped when configured to compile as modules. Here's a patch (against test13-pre4) for the Makefile: --- linux.old/drivers/net/Makefile Thu Dec 21 22:14:46 2000 +++ linux/drivers/net/Makefile Thu Dec 21 23:38:20 2000 @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ obj-n :=

Re: recommended gcc compiler version

2000-12-21 Thread Matthew D. Pitts
Robert, gcc 2.7.2.3 is the safest, but egcs 1.1.2 will work. any kernels built with gcc 2.95.x work but can be buggy. Matthew Pitts [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Robert B. Easter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 11:20 PM Sub

Re: Linux 2.4.0test12pre3ac4

2000-12-21 Thread Hans Grobler
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > o Quota fixes/updates (Jan Kara) This patch (?) to breaks compiling without quota's... diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude linux.13pre3/mm/vmscan.c linux.ac/mm/vmscan.c --- linux.13pre3/mm/vmscan.

PPPoE trouble

2000-12-21 Thread Jonathan Morton
Not entirely sure whether this is the right place to ask support questions, but here goes... I have set up a gateway machine running SuSE 6.4 and kernel 2.4.0-test12 for a family I am staying with in NM. The gateway is running fine on a 28.8 modem now, but the intent is to use it with the ADSL c

[PATCH] Configure.help for CONFIG_IRDA_OPTIONS

2000-12-21 Thread Steven Cole
Here is a micropatch to provide a help note for CONFIG_IRDA_OPTIONS. This applies against 2.4.0-test13-pre4. Steven diff -u linux/Documentation/Configure.help.orig linux/Documentation/Configure.help --- linux/Documentation/Configure.help.orig Thu Dec 21 21:16:50 2000 +++ linux/Documentation

Re: No more DoS

2000-12-21 Thread David S. Miller
From: Michael Peddemors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 20:20:06 -0800 > I think not holding onto any state for an incoming SYN is nothing but > a dream in any serious modern TCP implementation. It can be reduced, > but not eliminated. The former is what most modern st

2.4.0-test(4 - 11), iptables 1.1.2 and connect: invalid bug(?)

2000-12-21 Thread John Buswell
i have a problem with two machines (one running 2.4.0-t4, and the other 2.4.0-t11). The hardware in both machines is completely different (one is a 486dx4 and the other is a 533MHz celeron). i am starting to think that it is possibly a bug. The 2.4.0-t4 machine is running iptables v1.1.1 and the

Re: No more DoS

2000-12-21 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:24:44PM +1100, Mike OConnor wrote: > Hi > I would like to point who ever is in charge of the TCP stack for the linux > kernel at a site which claims to have a method of eliminate denial of service > (DoS) attacks > http://grc.com/r&d/nomoredos.htm > With my limited

Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup

2000-12-21 Thread Paul Cassella
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Daniel Phillips wrote: > But isn't this actually a simple situation? How about: I had only adapted that example because it had already been posted showing one way to do it, and so provided something to compare the sv approach to. > dmabuf_alloc(...) > { >

recommended gcc compiler version

2000-12-21 Thread Robert B. Easter
This is a newbie question, but what are the recommended gcc compiler versions for compiling, Linux 2.2.18? Linux 2.4.0? I'd rather use the recommended version than not and have difficult bugs. Thanks. If there is a FAQ, kindy direct me to it, or, if this info isn't in there specificly, per

Re: Linux 2.2.19pre3

2000-12-21 Thread Mitch Adair
> 2.2.19pre3 [snip] > o Optimise kernel compiler detect, kgcc before(Peter Samuelson) > gcc272 also I get an endless stream of this: kgcc:gcc272:cc:gcc: not found kgcc:gcc272:cc:gcc: not found /bin/sh: -D__KERNEL__: command not found /bin/sh: -D__KERNEL__: command not found /bin/sh

Re: No more DoS

2000-12-21 Thread Michael Peddemors
> Furthermore, it also cannot work because it makes retransmissions > of the SYN/ACK very non-workable. I suppose his TCP stack just hacks > around this by just waiting for the original client SYN to get > retransmitted or something like this. I question whether that can > even work reliably. B

Re: No more DoS

2000-12-21 Thread Michael Peddemors
Not only is this a well written article, and clearer than most other documents (Even Mine :>) but he is dead on track with his basic concepts.. Exactly what I have been looking into over at our company. (Well, close enough) The concept of trusting a SYN packet, has to go.. we have to assume tha

reliable oops in test12: kswapd: submit_bh

2000-12-21 Thread Paul Jakma
i have a server that Oopsed 3 nights in a row at nearly the same time 04:04:{22,26,22} each /second/ night (presumably nightly locate update) in the same place: in submit_bh while in kswapd. kernel in question is test12. machine is K6-233 with a DAC960 that does NFS/dialup/iptables serving. Test

Re: No more DoS

2000-12-21 Thread Tom Vier
This has already been discused here and on slashdot, on 9/25/2000. On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 01:24:44PM +1100, Mike OConnor wrote: > I would like to point who ever is in charge of the TCP stack for the linux > kernel at a site which claims to have a method of eliminate denial of service > (DoS) a

Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block error)

2000-12-21 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Marcelo Tosatti writes: > > It seems your code has a problem with bh flush time. > > > > In flush_dirty_buffers(), a buffer may (if being called from kupdate) only > > be written in case its old enough. (bh->b_flushtime) > > > > If the flush happens

Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block error)

2000-12-21 Thread Andreas Dilger
Marcelo Tosatti writes: > It seems your code has a problem with bh flush time. > > In flush_dirty_buffers(), a buffer may (if being called from kupdate) only > be written in case its old enough. (bh->b_flushtime) > > If the flush happens for an anonymous buffer, you'll end up writing all > buffe

Re: No more DoS

2000-12-21 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Fri, 22 Dec 2000 13:24:44 +1100 (CST) From: Mike OConnor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I would like to point who ever is in charge of the TCP stack for the linux kernel at a site which claims to have a method of eliminate denial of service (DoS) attacks http://grc.com/r&d/no

Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block error)

2000-12-21 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Chris Mason wrote: > Ok guys, I think I've taken Linus' suggestion to have buffer.c use its > own writepage a bit too far. This patch marks pages dirty when the > buffer head is marked dirty, and changes flush_dirty_buffers and > sync_buffers to use writepage instead of l

No more DoS

2000-12-21 Thread Mike OConnor
Hi I would like to point who ever is in charge of the TCP stack for the linux kernel at a site which claims to have a method of eliminate denial of service (DoS) attacks http://grc.com/r&d/nomoredos.htm With my limited unstanding of TCP and DoS attacks this would seem to be the answer, inst

Re: [PATCH] Re: fs corruption with invalidate_buffers()

2000-12-21 Thread Alexander Viro
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > > > > This is the result - against test12-pre7, but works well with > > test13-pre3: > > This looks bogus. It is bogus. My apologies. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block error)

2000-12-21 Thread Alexander Viro
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Chris Mason wrote: > Obvious bug, block_write_full_page zeros out the bits past the end of > file every time. This should not be needed for normal file writes. Unfortunately, it _is_ needed for pageout path. mmap() the last page of file. Dirty the data past the EOF (MMU

Re: [PATCH] Re: fs corruption with invalidate_buffers()

2000-12-21 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 05:01:00PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > > > > The test I did initially was the following: > > > > if(!atomic_read(&bh->b_count) && > > (destroy_dirty_buffers || !buffer_dirty(bh)) > > && ! (bh->b_page && bh->b_p

osst driver for 2.4.0

2000-12-21 Thread Kurt Garloff
Hi Linus, I'd like to ask you to include the osst driver into the next 2.4 kernels. The osst driver is a new SCSI high-level driver, able to drive the OnStream SC-x0, DI-x0 and USBx0 tape driver, offering a st interface to the userspace. The reason for its existance is, that those OnStream devs a

Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup

2000-12-21 Thread Daniel Phillips
Paul Cassella wrote: > The sync variable version of the dmabuf code snippet (assuming the > dmabuf_mutex is never acquired from an interrupt) would look like this: > > dmabuf_init(...); > { > ... > spin_lock_init(&dmabuf_spin); > sv_init(&dmabuf_sv, &dm

Re: 2.4.0 kernels and vpn

2000-12-21 Thread Michael Peddemors
Not for a good solution IMHO, run don't walk to FreeS/WAN first, and save yourself a lot of grief On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, John Covici wrote: > Excuse my ignorance, but what is cipe? > > Also, I received a comment that all I had to do was enable gre > tunneling, is this correct? > >

test13-pre4

2000-12-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
More Makefile cleanups, otherwise mainly noticeable are the netfilter fix and the LVM update. Linus - - pre4: - Christoph Rohland: shmfs cleanup - Nicolas Pitre: don't forget loop.c flags - Geert Uytterhoeven: new-style m68k Makefiles - Neil Brown: knfsd cleanu

Re: [PATCH] fix emu10k1 init breakage in 2.2.18

2000-12-21 Thread Andreas M. Kirchwitz
Juri Haberland wrote: >>> 2.2.18 broke the emu10k1 driver when compiled into the kernel. >> >> Is there also a fix available to make the bass and treble settings >> work again in mixer applications (for example, Gnome mix 1.2.0)? > > Yes, put something like "EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DTONE_CONTROL

Re: Purging the Page Table (was: Purging the Buffer Cache)

2000-12-21 Thread Al Peat
--- Juri Haberland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Al Peat wrote: > > > > Is there any way to completely purge the buffer > > cache -- not just the write requests (ala 'sync' > or > > 'update'), but the whole thing? Can I just call > > invalidate_buffers() or destroy_buffers()? > > What about the

Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup

2000-12-21 Thread Daniel Phillips
Paul Cassella wrote: > > int atomic_read_and_clear(atomic_t *p) > > { > > int n = atomic_read(p); > > atomic_sub(p, n); > > return n; > > } > > I don't think this will work; consider two callers doing the atomic_read() > at the same time, or someone else doing an atomic_de

[PATCH] Re: e820 memory detection fix for ThinkPad

2000-12-21 Thread Marc Joosen
David Weinhall wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 07:16:40PM -0500, Marc Joosen wrote: > > > > This is a tiny patch to make the int15/e820 memory mapping work on IBM > > ThinkPads. Until now, I have had to give lilo a mem= option with one meg > > If this simple patch solves your problem, great!

Re: [PATCH] Re: fs corruption with invalidate_buffers()

2000-12-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > > The test I did initially was the following: > > if(!atomic_read(&bh->b_count) && > (destroy_dirty_buffers || !buffer_dirty(bh)) > && ! (bh->b_page && bh->b_page->mapping) > ) > > That is, I was explicitely checking for a mapped

Linux 2.2.19pre3

2000-12-21 Thread Alan Cox
2.2.19pre3 o Merge ADMtek-comet tulip support(Jim McQuillan) o Update microcode driver (Tigran Aivazian) o Merge Don Becker's NE2K full duplex support (Juan Lacarta) o Optimise kernel compiler detect, kgcc before(Peter Samuel

Re: 2.4.0 kernels and vpn

2000-12-21 Thread Kurt Garloff
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 07:25:18PM -0500, John Covici wrote: > Excuse my ignorance, but what is cipe? CIPE = Crypto IP Encapsulation. See http://sites.inka.de/~W1011/devel/cipe.html Some version of cipe is in the kerneli patches: ftp://ftp.YOURCOUNTRY.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/astor/ I

Re: [PATCH] Re: fs corruption with invalidate_buffers()

2000-12-21 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 04:37:30PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > This looks bogus. It may be - I just did what Al told me without really understanding it ;-) The test I did initially was the following: if(!atomic_read(&bh->b_count) && (destroy_dirty_buffers || !buffer_dirty(bh))

Linux 2.4.0test12pre3ac4

2000-12-21 Thread Alan Cox
This is mostly so people can see what I have merged in my tree and what has gone from it. The patch for the adventurous is in ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4.0test/.. 2.4.0test13pre3-ac4 o Fix FPU emulation compile (Adam Richter) o

Re: strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread John Covici
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Andreas Dilger wrote: > John Covici writes: > > Here is my /etc/exports > > > > / ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > > /usr ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > > /usr/src ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > > /home ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > > /hard1 ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > > /hard2 ccs2(rw,no_root_squ

Re: vm 2.2.18 (stock kernel) process hara-kiri's

2000-12-21 Thread Alan Cox
> I thought the 2.2.18 vm would be better :-)... nver have seen so much > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for... messages. Try 2.2.19pre2 or higher - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http

Re: [PATCH] Re: fs corruption with invalidate_buffers()

2000-12-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jan Niehusmann wrote: > > This is the result - against test12-pre7, but works well with > test13-pre3: This looks bogus. You can't test "bh->b_next!=0", because that is entirely meaningless. b_next can be NULL either because the buffer isn't hashed, or because the buffe

osst driver update 0.8.5->0.8.6.1

2000-12-21 Thread Kurt Garloff
Hi Alan, thanks for merging the osst driver (a driver which support the OnStream SC-x0, DI-x0 and USB30 tape drives) into the 2.2.19pre1 kernel. I'd like to ask you to apply the attached patch on top of it, upgrading the driver version from 0.8.5 to 0.8.6.1. Changes: * README.osst does not talk

max number of ide controllers?

2000-12-21 Thread Charles Wilkins
I have been running with the 2 onboard VIA ide hd controllers (ide 0 and ide 1) along with a creative labs ide contoller on a SB32 soundcard (ide 3). This has had the cdrom and zip drive.   I just added a Promise Ultra100 and it has assumed the role of ide 3 and ide 4. The onboard controllers

Re: 2.4.0 kernels and vpn

2000-12-21 Thread John Covici
Excuse my ignorance, but what is cipe? Also, I received a comment that all I had to do was enable gre tunneling, is this correct? Thanks. On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Kurt Garloff wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 01:40:16PM -0500, John Covici wrote: > > Hi. Is there a way to support vpn in the 2.4.0

Re: 2.4.0 kernels and vpn

2000-12-21 Thread Kurt Garloff
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 01:40:16PM -0500, John Covici wrote: > Hi. Is there a way to support vpn in the 2.4.0 kernels like we had > with the patch for the 2.2.x kernels? > > Any assistance would be appreciated. FreeS/WAN: A Linux IPsec implementation: http://www.xs4all.nl/~freeswan/ Or look at

vm 2.2.18 (stock kernel) process hara-kiri's

2000-12-21 Thread Roeland Th. Jansen
I thought the 2.2.18 vm would be better :-)... nver have seen so much VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for... messages. at first the system froze for several seconds. an emer sync worked just fine so I waited.. Dec 22 00:06:10 grobbebol kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for telnet... Dec

Re: strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread Andreas Dilger
John Covici writes: > Here is my /etc/exports > > / ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > /usr ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > /usr/src ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > /home ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > /hard1 ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > /hard2 ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > /hard3 ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) > /hard4 ccs2(rw,no_root

[PATCH] Re: fs corruption with invalidate_buffers()

2000-12-21 Thread Jan Niehusmann
The file corruption I reported on Dec 6 is still there in test13-pre3. (I can only reproduce it easily with the ext2 online resizing patches, but I really don't think it is caused by them) The corruption happens if invalidate_buffers calls put_last_free() on buffers that belong to mapped pages. T

Re: strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread John Covici
Here is my /etc/exports / ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) /usr ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) /usr/src ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) /home ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) /hard1 ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) /hard2 ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) /hard3 ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) /hard4 ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) /usr/bbs ccs2(rw,no_root_squash

[RFC] changes to buffer.c (was Test12 ll_rw_block error)

2000-12-21 Thread Chris Mason
Ok guys, I think I've taken Linus' suggestion to have buffer.c use its own writepage a bit too far. This patch marks pages dirty when the buffer head is marked dirty, and changes flush_dirty_buffers and sync_buffers to use writepage instead of ll_rw_block. The idea is to allow filesystems t

Re: strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday December 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Neil Brown wrote: > > > On Thursday December 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi. I am having strange nfs problems in both my 2.x and 2.4.0-test12 > > > kernels. > > > > > > What is happening is that when the machine boo

Re: strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread John Covici
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Neil Brown wrote: > On Thursday December 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi. I am having strange nfs problems in both my 2.x and 2.4.0-test12 > > kernels. > > > > What is happening is that when the machine boots up and exports the > > directories for nfs, it complains that

Re: Cleanup (PCI API and general) of drivers/net/rcpci.c (240t13p3)

2000-12-21 Thread Rasmus Andersen
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 10:46:52PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > o The driver currently allocates irqs during its initialization > > instead of postponing it until it is opened for use. Is there > > a reason for this? > > Shouldnt be - its an I2O network interface with some extra bits for > the

Re: Wiring down Pages

2000-12-21 Thread Robert Read
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 06:46:33PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > > page_cache_drop(page); <= removes your extra count I can't find that function, do you mean page_cache_free() and page_cache_release(), both are aliases for __free_page(). Maybe we need another alias. :) Should non-page cache rela

Re: Cleanup (PCI API and general) of drivers/net/rcpci.c (240t13p3)

2000-12-21 Thread Alan Cox
> Questions for the maintainers, should they read this (does anyone > know their email addresses?) (others should feel free to chip in): I've not heard from them for a long time > o The driver currently allocates irqs during its initialization > instead of postponing it until it is opened for

Cleanup (PCI API and general) of drivers/net/rcpci.c (240t13p3)

2000-12-21 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. This is the final version of my rcpci45.c patch. It is somewhat more ambitious than the last one (which only cleaned up the PCI API), so I would appreciate feedback since I don't know half of what I am doing (questions galore below). It features: o Conversion to new PCI API. o Removal of a

Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup

2000-12-21 Thread Tim Wright
Looks good. I'd like to play with you patch, but certainly from a first glance, it would seem to be sufficiently powerful, and significantly cleaner/clearer (at least to me :-) than the current mechanism involving the wait queue games. Regards, Tim -- Tim Wright - [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL P

Re: strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday December 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. I am having strange nfs problems in both my 2.x and 2.4.0-test12 > kernels. > > What is happening is that when the machine boots up and exports the > directories for nfs, it complains that > > ccs2:/ invalid argument . > > The exports ent

Re: Laptop system clock slow after suspend to disk. (2.4.0-test9/hinote VP)

2000-12-21 Thread Keith Owens
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000 02:26:12 + (GMT), Ian Stirling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I've not noticed this on earlier kernel versions, is there something >silly I'm missing that's making my DEC hinote VP (p100 laptop)s >system clock slow by a factor of five or so after resume? >Not the CPU or cmos

Re: bigphysarea support in 2.2.19 and 2.4.0 kernels

2000-12-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
Alan, I am looking over the 2.4 bigphysarea patch, and I think I agree there needs to be a better approach. It's a messy hack -- I agree. :-) Jeff > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Please read the

[PATCH] generic_file_map drop-behind fix

2000-12-21 Thread Rik van Riel
Hi Ingo, the attached patch (against 2.4.0-test12-pre3) should fix the problem where generic_file_write() causes a page to be moved to the inactive list when the program is still writing to it. Does this patch fix the web benching bottleneck in tux2 ? ;) regards, Rik -- Hollywood goes for worl

Re: bigphysarea support in 2.2.19 and 2.4.0 kernels

2000-12-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:32:46PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > > A question related to bigphysarea support in the native Linux > > 2.2.19 and 2.4.0 kernels. > > > > I know there are patches for this support, but is it planned for > > rolling into the kernel by default to support Dolphin SCI and >

Re: lockups from heavy IDE/CD-ROM usage

2000-12-21 Thread Daniel Stone
> I get this on the 440LX with the same DMA timeout message. Everyone says it's > the board's fault as well. Funny. Anyways this happens accross just about > any Dev kernel but more so in the -test12 and up versions. . Test10 works > fine without locking. Blaming the hardware reminds me of

Re: bigphysarea support in 2.2.19 and 2.4.0 kernels

2000-12-21 Thread Alan Cox
> A question related to bigphysarea support in the native Linux > 2.2.19 and 2.4.0 kernels. > > I know there are patches for this support, but is it planned for > rolling into the kernel by default to support Dolphin SCI and > some of the NUMA Clustering adapters. I see it there for some > of

Re: IDE woes:linux and BIOS won't agree on C/H/S detection

2000-12-21 Thread Guest section DW
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 03:25:20AM +0900, Ishikawa wrote: [a long and very well documented story] > How can I "erase" this 2940/255/63 CHS setting from the disk It is far from clear that it is on your disk, so it is far from clear that something can be erased. First a few warnings - probably y

Re: Wiring down Pages

2000-12-21 Thread Rik van Riel
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Sourav Sen wrote: > Suppose I want to wire-down( as they call in BSD ) a page > in memory, how I go about doing that? (I guess by setting the > PG_locked bit of the flags field in the struct page, I can do > it, am I right?) Linux simply uses page->count for this. By u

bigphysarea support in 2.2.19 and 2.4.0 kernels

2000-12-21 Thread Jeff V. Merkey
A question related to bigphysarea support in the native Linux 2.2.19 and 2.4.0 kernels. I know there are patches for this support, but is it planned for rolling into the kernel by default to support Dolphin SCI and some of the NUMA Clustering adapters. I see it there for some of the video a

Re: Blow Torch (Re: lockups from heavy IDE/CD-ROM usage)

2000-12-21 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote: > On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, safemode wrote: > > > I get this on the 440LX with the same DMA timeout message. Everyone says it's > > the board's fault as well. Funny. Anyways this happens accross just about > > any Dev kernel but more so in the -test12 and

Wiring down Pages

2000-12-21 Thread Sourav Sen
Hi, I am a novice in this exciting kernel world, so my questions may be a bit naive, please bear with me.(I am student at IISc, Bangalore). Suppose I want to wire-down( as they call in BSD ) a page in memory, how I go about doing that? (I guess by setting the PG_locked bit of the

Blow Torch (Re: lockups from heavy IDE/CD-ROM usage)

2000-12-21 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, safemode wrote: > I get this on the 440LX with the same DMA timeout message. Everyone says it's > the board's fault as well. Funny. Anyways this happens accross just about > any Dev kernel but more so in the -test12 and up versions. . Test10 works > fine without locking

Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2

2000-12-21 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 02:28:58PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I was in the process of fixing this (I also just backported the thinkpad > %edx clobber fix), but if somebody is going to work on this please let > me know so we stay in sync. Ok this should fix the e820 memory detection, against

Re: lockups from heavy IDE/CD-ROM usage

2000-12-21 Thread safemode
Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > Problem: When i am using my harddrive and cdrom, my computer will freeze. > It freezes in two different ways.. sometimes just the harddrive access > will freeze (can still do things in X as long as they dont require the > harddrive), and then everything freezes within a fe

Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup

2000-12-21 Thread Paul Cassella
The mechanism being developed here seems a lot like synchronization variables (aka condition variables), which are a part of the "monitor" synchronization construct. There is a simple implementation of them in the xfs patch. I've been working on a more general version in order to aid porting som

Re: Oop in 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Ian Hastie wrote: > Looks like page_launder is still causing problems. I was using > ReiserFS version 3.6.23. As far as I remember it was running > Seti@Home 3.03 and compile qt-2.2.3. I was able to run ksymoops > without rebooting. So, can you (or anyone) reproduce any o

Re: kapm-idled : is this a bug?

2000-12-21 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
>> Agree that it is different. But it confuses people to have two >> idle-tasks. I suggest that we throw it one big pile, unless having a >> separate apm idle task has a purpose. > > You can't do that. Sure you can, and it makes perfect sense. > Doing it this way is _way_ better for system > st

Re: strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread Charles Wilkins
I can confirm this problem exists in Mandrake-7.2 as well with kernel 2.2.17-21. - Original Message - From: "John Covici" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:37 PM Subject: strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12 > Hi. I am having str

Re: Oops with 2.4.0-test13pre3 - swapoff

2000-12-21 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > > This is oops I've got when rebooting after some heavy disk activity on > > > my SMP system: > > > > > > Written by hand: > > > > > > kernel BUG swap_state.c:78! > > [snip] > > > > Same here during a halt of a RH 6.2 b

Re: Unknown PCI device?

2000-12-21 Thread Bruce Korb
"Mike A. Harris" wrote: > >> Anyone know what this is? > >> > >> 00:07.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc.: Unknown device 3050 (rev 30) > >> Flags: medium devsel > > > >if its pci id is 0x11063050, then it's a VIA Power Management Controller. > > 00:07.3 Class 0600: 1106:3050 (rev 30)

2.4.0 kernels and vpn

2000-12-21 Thread John Covici
Hi. Is there a way to support vpn in the 2.4.0 kernels like we had with the patch for the 2.2.x kernels? Any assistance would be appreciated. -- John Covici [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message t

strange nfs behavior in 2.2.18 and 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread John Covici
Hi. I am having strange nfs problems in both my 2.x and 2.4.0-test12 kernels. What is happening is that when the machine boots up and exports the directories for nfs, it complains that ccs2:/ invalid argument . The exports entry is / ccs2(rw,no_root_squash) Now in Kernel 2.2.18, if I stop an

IDE woes:linux and BIOS won't agree on C/H/S detection

2000-12-21 Thread Ishikawa
IDE woes. Sorry for this lengthy post, I read ide.txt, large-disk-howto.txt and experimented with fdisk (DOS/WIN), dd, and a few other tricks, but can't seem to be able to solve a question. Big Question - 1: I have a 20GB seagate ATA disk. My Board BIOS recognizes the CHS geometry when it auto-d

Re: 2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-21 Thread Thomas Dodd
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 05:55:08PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > > x() > > > { > > > > > > switch (1) { > > > case 0: > > > case 1: > > > case 2: > > > case 3: > > > ; > > > } > > > } > >

Re: CPU attachent and detachment in a running Linux system

2000-12-21 Thread Heiko . Carstens
Hi, >> That's a good point and it would probably work for attachment of cpus, but >> it won't work for detachment because there are some data structures that >> need to be updated if a cpu gets detached. For example it would be nice >> [...] >> So at least for detaching it would make sense to

Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2

2000-12-21 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > It would also be nice if you could show a real life > showstopper-production-bottleneck where we need C) to fix it. I > cannot see any useful usage of C in production 2.2.x. Me neither. I'm just wondering at the reason why 2.2 semantics would be di

Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2

2000-12-21 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 03:07:08PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: > c) will also implement a) in an obviously right and simple way. So go ahead. If you think that's so simple and obviously right you can post here a patch here against 2.2.19pre2 that implements C) to show real facts. My B is here:

Oop in 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread Ian Hastie
Looks like page_launder is still causing problems. I was using ReiserFS version 3.6.23. As far as I remember it was running Seti@Home 3.03 and compile qt-2.2.3. I was able to run ksymoops without rebooting. ksymoops 2.3.5 on i686 2.4.0-test12. Options used -v /boot/vmlinux-2.4.0-test12 (

Re: [PATCH] few fixes for ymf_sb.c in test13pre3-ac3

2000-12-21 Thread Alan Cox
> CONFIG_SOUND_YMFPCI is declared twice - once outside CONFIG_OSS, then > inside CONFIG_OSS. I'm removing the later declaration. Its an in progress thing. The next stage is to remove ymf_sb completely as we have done in 2.2.19pre and to put the ymf_sb midi magic into it - To unsubscribe from thi

[PATCH] few fixes for ymf_sb.c in test13pre3-ac3

2000-12-21 Thread Pavel Roskin
Hello, Alan! Thank you for applying my patch to test13pre3-ac3! However, there is a glaring bug in drivers/sound/Config.in - CONFIG_SOUND_YMFPCI is declared twice - once outside CONFIG_OSS, then inside CONFIG_OSS. I'm removing the later declaration. CONFIG_SOUND_YMPCI should be disabled if the

Re: tighter compression for x86 kernels

2000-12-21 Thread John Reiser
> > Both source (GPLv2) and pre-compiled binary for x86 are available. >^ > That's not true. Read > http://wildsau.idv.uni-linz.ac.at/mfx/upx-license.html The UPX team owns all copyright in all of UPX and in each part of UPX. Therefore, the UPX team may choose which license(

Re: [PATCH] Quota patches for test12

2000-12-21 Thread Jan Kara
> I've ported my quota patches for 2.4.0-test12. > You can download the patches from > ftp://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/pub/local/jack/quota/v2.4/ > quota-fix-2.4.0-test12-1.diff.gz > and > quota-patch-2.4.0-test12-1.diff.gz Sorry to follow up myself. I had better tell what those patches do :-):

Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2

2000-12-21 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > The key question is: which of the following do we want? > > > > a) A simple, specific accept()-accelerator, and 2.2 remains without > >an exclusive wq API or > > To make the accellerator we need a minimal wake-one support. So a) doesn't > mak

Re: [RFC] Semaphores used for daemon wakeup

2000-12-21 Thread Tim Wright
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 02:34:56AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Yes, I see. There are a lot of similarities to the situation I > described. The main difference between this situation and bdflush is > that dmabuf_free isn't really waiting on dmabuf_alloc to fullfill a > condition (other tha

Re: [Patch] performance enhancement for simple_strtoul

2000-12-21 Thread Alan Cox
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > +while (isdigit(c)) { > > +result = (result*10) + (c & 0x0f); > > +c = *(++cp); > > +} > > x * 10 can be written as: > > (x << 2 + x) <

Re: memmove() in 2.4.0-test12, alpha platform

2000-12-21 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:03:42PM +0300, Alexander Zarochentcev wrote: > New (since test12) optimized memmove function seems to be broken > on alpha platform. Indeed it is. > If dest and src arguments are misaligned, new memmove does wrong things. Actually it broke when dest < src. Incrementi

2.4.0-12: Hard Hang related to Serial Mouse

2000-12-21 Thread Jim Bray
I'm not on this list, so please respond directly to me for more info. I was running 2.4.0-12 (back to -10 now), K6-2 chip. With -12, the system would hard-hang quite frequently. Complete lockup: no response to alt-sysrq, so no info available. Eventually I figured out that this was only happenin

Re: Linux 2.2.19pre2

2000-12-21 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Thu, Dec 21, 2000 at 09:38:43PM +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > > The fact you could mix non-exclusive and exlusive wakeups in the same waitqueue > > was a feature not a misfeature. Then of course you cannot register in two > > waitqueues one with wake-one and one w

Limiting disk-io

2000-12-21 Thread Erik Tews
Hi I am going to create a shell-server for a networking-meeting with cd-writer. Usually, this is not a problem, but I would like to know if there are any kernel-patches which can limit the io-bandwidth for a user to the harddisk so that a user which is using the cd-writer has at least x kb/s. Re

  1   2   >