> On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Steve Grubb wrote:
>
> > + while (isdigit(c)) {
> > + result = (result*10) + (c & 0x0f);
> > + c = *(++cp);
> > + }
>
> x * 10 can be written as:
>
> (x << 2 + x) << 1 = (4x+x) * 2
> (x << 3) + (x << 1) = 8x + 2x
Since when has printk been performance critical. It isnt worth microoptimising
(or in your case for some cpus micropessimising) that stuff. Besides, gcc should
work it out if its worth doing
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [Patch] performance enhancement for simple_strtoul Steve Grubb
- Re: [Patch] performance enhancement for simple_strtou... Jeff Epler
- Re: [Patch] performance enhancement for simple_st... Steve Grubb
- Re: [Patch] performance enhancement for simple_st... Steve Grubb
- Re: [Patch] performance enhancement for simpl... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Patch] performance enhancement for s... Pavel Machek
- Re: [Patch] performance enhancement ... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [Patch] performance enhancement for simple_strtou... Matthias Andree
- Re: [Patch] performance enhancement for simple_strtou... Pavel Machek

