On 23/01/11 23:06, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
I see a second draft is out.
Updates from the usual places:
http://www.lingnu.com/he/howto/78-si1452.html
Complains should probably go here:
http://blog.shemesh.biz/2011/01/%D7%98%D7%99%D7%95%D7%98%D7%90-%D7%A9%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%AA%D7%991452/
The key
I see a second draft is out.
Updates from the usual places:
http://www.lingnu.com/he/howto/78-si1452.html
Complains should probably go here:
http://blog.shemesh.biz/2011/01/%D7%98%D7%99%D7%95%D7%98%D7%90-%D7%A9%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%AA%D7%991452/
The key I was missing ended up in the logical pla
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 05:11, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Dotan, I'd ask you constructive questions, but as you've obviously did not
> read the comment thread on my blog (or you wouldn't say these incorrect
> things), I can't. Please attempt at being informed before passing criticism.
>
> Also, when
On 17/01/11 00:00, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 23:02, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi Shachar. I notice that the RLM and LRM are not implemented in the
new keyboard layout. You might want to mention to the rest of the
committee that there exist users who use the lyx layout specifical
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 23:02, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>> Hi Shachar. I notice that the RLM and LRM are not implemented in the
>> new keyboard layout. You might want to mention to the rest of the
>> committee that there exist users who use the lyx layout specifically
>> for those two most useful char
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:50:16PM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 22:18, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> > Hi Tzafrir, as well as anyone else who want to pursue this development
> > independently.
> >
> > I think the community is having a hard time wrapping its head around a
> > fund
On 16/01/11 22:53, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi,
If that key won't be included at all, I figure I won't go manually
editing every system around.
Had you read the comments on my blog, you would have known that this key
will be included, as well as gershaim and the rest of them. We just
didn't get ar
On 16/01/11 22:50, Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 22:18, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
The best way to get your feedback considered by the committee
(before reaching the public comments stage, that is) is by*reading all the
comments* on the blog post Tzafrir pointed to, and then, if w
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Thankfully, Hamakor has a couple of representatives at the committee,
> and one of them (yours truly) did his best to make the process as
> transparent as possible. The best way to get your feedback considered by
> the c
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 22:18, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Hi Tzafrir, as well as anyone else who want to pursue this development
> independently.
>
> I think the community is having a hard time wrapping its head around a
> fundamental fact of the new keyboard standard. This is not an open source
> p
d, etc.) were approved by a committee without having
been actually implemented and put to trial by fire.
In the case of the new SI1452 keyboard layout standard, it means that it
should be easy for people to try various keyboard layouts and see which
feels right to them and why. It should be easy f
On 13/01/11 10:52, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Hi
So I set up a small git repo with the xkb mapping and put my changes
in a branch:
http://gitorious.org/si1452-xkb/si1452-xkb/commits/tzafrir
Hi Tzafrir, as well as anyone else who want to pursue this development
independently.
I think the commu
Hi
Long ago there was a thread on the ivrix-discuss mailing list with the
title "SI1452 insanity"[1]. I've been a long time proponent of the "lyx"
variant of the Israely X11 keyboard layout rather than the standard one
(Standard of Israel no. 1452).
Luckily in thr last year there has been some wo
13 matches
Mail list logo
